Provision record
Apple · Apple App Store Review Guidelines · View original document ↗

Anti-Steering Prohibition on External Purchase Links

High severity Common · 287 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Apple and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

Apps cannot include buttons, links, or messages that tell customers they can buy the same thing cheaper somewhere else — all digital purchase prompts must go through Apple's own payment system.

This analysis describes what Apple's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This clause establishes a standardized purchasing pathway requirement across the App Store ecosystem, directing all transactions through Apple's in-app purchase system. The prohibition on external purchase links and misleading pricing creates operational uniformity in how financial transactions and product information are presented to users.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jun 9, 2026

The updated guidelines state that developers must ensure kids receive age-appropriate experiences within their apps and must remove user-generated content that violates the guidelines, terms of service, or community standards. Under the revised policy, if Apple identifies policy-violating content, the developer will be asked to remove it and provide a compliance improvement plan. Based on the developer's response, the app may be removed from the App Store until compliance is demonstrated. This establishes a formal escalation pathway where developer inaction or inadequate remediation can result in app suspension or removal.

View change record →

Clause Stability Mostly Stable

1
Change
5
Months Monitored
Apr 9, 2026
First Seen
Apr 10, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 4261 other provisions on other platforms.
This clause has changed once in 5 months of monitoring.

Change history

removed Jun 9, 2026

Removal of this as a standalone high-severity provision (content merged into broader IAP requirement) reduces explicit emphasis on anti-steering and pricing transparency enforcement.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Consumers cannot be told within an iOS app that they could pay less for a subscription or digital content by purchasing directly from the developer's website, potentially costing them more money than necessary.

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

Tinder is not responsible for the availability (or lack of availability) of any external websites or resources or their content. Furthermore, Tinder is not responsible for, and does not endorse, any products or services that may be offered by third-party websites...

Perplexity AI Medium

we do not warrant that Offering descriptions are accurate, complete, reliable, current, or error-free.

Skillshare Medium

Please note that these third parties are responsible for their own privacy practices.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Apps and their metadata may not include buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms other than in-app purchase. Developers may not include misleading or inaccurate pricing information in their apps or metadata.

Excerpt from Apple's App Store Review Guidelines

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: This provision is the subject of a permanent injunction in Epic Games v.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →
  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Applicable regulations

FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Apple App Store Review Guidelines
Entity
Apple
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
March 6, 2026
Last verified
April 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-002425
Document ID
CA-D-00025
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
877541265fefdbebabcd1e30fe9651433f6b1dd3064ee4d811f9f9918e043f98
Analysis generated
March 6, 2026 20:15 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Apple
Document: Apple App Store Review Guidelines
Record ID: CA-P-002425
Captured: 2026-03-06 20:15:42 UTC
SHA-256: 877541265fefdbeb…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/apple/apple-app-store-review-guidelines/provision/CA-P-002425/anti-steering-prohibition-on-external-purchase-links/
Accessed: Aug. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Apple's Anti-Steering Prohibition on External Purchase Links clause do?

This clause establishes a standardized purchasing pathway requirement across the App Store ecosystem, directing all transactions through Apple's in-app purchase system. The prohibition on external purchase links and misleading pricing creates operational uniformity in how financial transactions and product information are presented to users.

How does this clause affect you?

Consumers cannot be told within an iOS app that they could pay less for a subscription or digital content by purchasing directly from the developer's website, potentially costing them more money than necessary.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 287 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Apple?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Apple.