Any suggestions or ideas you share with Airtable about improving the product become Airtable's property, and Airtable can use them freely without paying you or keeping them confidential.
This analysis describes what Airtable's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
If you share product ideas or improvement suggestions with Airtable, you permanently transfer ownership of those ideas to Airtable with no compensation, even if Airtable later commercially implements your suggestion.
This clause means that any feedback you provide through support tickets, feature requests, or user research sessions becomes Airtable's property; users and enterprises should be careful about submitting proprietary or confidential improvement ideas through the platform.
How other platforms handle this
You may give a Redfin Company Feedback. You hereby assign to the applicable Redfin Company all of your right, title, and interest in and to the Feedback. To the extent applicable law does not permit assignment of the Feedback, you hereby grant the Redfin Companies a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide...
Any Mods you create for Minecraft: Java Edition from scratch belong to you (including pre-run Mods and in-memory Mods) and you can do whatever you want with them, as long as you don't sell them for money / try to make money from them and so long as you don't distribute Modded Versions of the game. R...
As between you and Jasper, you own your Inputs and, subject to your compliance with these Terms, Jasper assigns to you all of its right, title, and interest in and to the Outputs. Jasper does not warrant that the Outputs will be original, that your use of the Outputs will not infringe the rights of ...
Monitoring
Airtable has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"You may choose, or we may invite you, to submit comments, feedback, or ideas about our Services, including about how to improve our Services ("Feedback"). You agree that we will own any such Feedback, and that we are free to use the Feedback without any additional compensation to you, and to disclose the Feedback on a non-confidential basis or otherwise to anyone.— Excerpt from Airtable's Airtable Terms of Service
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Feedback assignment clauses are standard in SaaS agreements and are generally enforceable in the US under contract law. Potential interaction with intellectual property law exists if the feedback contains novel inventions, though the clause is directed at ideas rather than patented inventions. In jurisdictions with moral rights protections (EU, Canada), the practical enforceability of assignment of all rights in feedback may be subject to limitations. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low. Feedback assignment is standard practice in the SaaS industry and creates limited legal exposure for most users. However, organizations that submit detailed product roadmap suggestions or technical improvement ideas should be aware that such submissions are covered by this clause. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU jurisdictions with moral rights in intellectual property may limit the practical scope of feedback assignment. Organizations with policies against uncompensated IP transfers should flag this clause for internal review. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise procurement teams may want to negotiate a carve-out for feedback that constitutes proprietary business or technical information, particularly if their product suggestions could reveal competitive strategies. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Organizations with internal IP policies should ensure employees are aware that feedback submitted to Airtable is assigned to Airtable under these terms. Legal teams may want to negotiate a confidentiality carve-out for feedback submitted through enterprise agreements.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Buried in Robinhood's customer agreement is broad authority to close your positions, suspend your account, and force arbitration. Here is what it actually says.
Stripe's terms authorize fund reserves, payout withholding, and account termination. Here is what the agreement states and what business owners should review.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
If you share product ideas or improvement suggestions with Airtable, you permanently transfer ownership of those ideas to Airtable with no compensation, even if Airtable later commercially implements your suggestion.
This clause means that any feedback you provide through support tickets, feature requests, or user research sessions becomes Airtable's property; users and enterprises should be careful about submitting proprietary or confidential improvement ideas through the platform.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 1 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Airtable.