Airtable · Airtable Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Feedback Ownership Assignment

Low severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 325 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Airtable Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Any suggestions or ideas you share with Airtable about improving the product become Airtable's property, and Airtable can use them freely without paying you or keeping them confidential.

This analysis describes what Airtable's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

If you share product ideas or improvement suggestions with Airtable, you permanently transfer ownership of those ideas to Airtable with no compensation, even if Airtable later commercially implements your suggestion.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

This clause means that any feedback you provide through support tickets, feature requests, or user research sessions becomes Airtable's property; users and enterprises should be careful about submitting proprietary or confidential improvement ideas through the platform.

How other platforms handle this

Wealthfront Medium

You agree, however, that (i) by submitting unsolicited ideas to Wealthfront or any of its employees or representatives, by any medium, including but not limited to email, written, or oral communication, you automatically forfeit your right to any intellectual property rights in such ideas; and (ii) ...

Writer Medium

If you provide Writer with any feedback, suggestions, or other input regarding the Services ('Feedback'), you hereby assign to Writer all right, title, and interest in and to such Feedback, including all intellectual property rights therein. Writer may use such Feedback for any purpose without restr...

Redfin Medium

You may give a Redfin Company Feedback. You hereby assign to the applicable Redfin Company all of your right, title, and interest in and to the Feedback. To the extent applicable law does not permit assignment of the Feedback, you hereby grant the Redfin Companies a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Airtable has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You may choose, or we may invite you, to submit comments, feedback, or ideas about our Services, including about how to improve our Services ("Feedback"). You agree that we will own any such Feedback, and that we are free to use the Feedback without any additional compensation to you, and to disclose the Feedback on a non-confidential basis or otherwise to anyone.

— Excerpt from Airtable's Airtable Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Feedback assignment clauses are standard in SaaS agreements and are generally enforceable in the US under contract law. Potential interaction with intellectual property law exists if the feedback contains novel inventions, though the clause is directed at ideas rather than patented inventions. In jurisdictions with moral rights protections (EU, Canada), the practical enforceability of assignment of all rights in feedback may be subject to limitations. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low. Feedback assignment is standard practice in the SaaS industry and creates limited legal exposure for most users. However, organizations that submit detailed product roadmap suggestions or technical improvement ideas should be aware that such submissions are covered by this clause. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU jurisdictions with moral rights in intellectual property may limit the practical scope of feedback assignment. Organizations with policies against uncompensated IP transfers should flag this clause for internal review. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise procurement teams may want to negotiate a carve-out for feedback that constitutes proprietary business or technical information, particularly if their product suggestions could reveal competitive strategies. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Organizations with internal IP policies should ensure employees are aware that feedback submitted to Airtable is assigned to Airtable under these terms. Legal teams may want to negotiate a confidentiality carve-out for feedback submitted through enterprise agreements.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Watcher free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Provision details

Document information
Document
Airtable Terms of Service
Entity
Airtable
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 9, 2026
Last verified
May 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-007280
Document ID
CA-D-00551
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
a3cfadb271369d3e777a0a809c5b673feaa79f75a4666d9d1c6228a92064eec9
Analysis generated
May 9, 2026 16:59 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Airtable
Document: Airtable Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-007280
Captured: 2026-05-09 16:59:03 UTC
SHA-256: a3cfadb271369d3e…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/airtable/airtable-terms-of-service/feedback-ownership-assignment/
Accessed: May 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Low
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Professional free trial

Or start with Watcher →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Airtable's Feedback Ownership Assignment clause do?

If you share product ideas or improvement suggestions with Airtable, you permanently transfer ownership of those ideas to Airtable with no compensation, even if Airtable later commercially implements your suggestion.

How does this clause affect you?

This clause means that any feedback you provide through support tickets, feature requests, or user research sessions becomes Airtable's property; users and enterprises should be careful about submitting proprietary or confidential improvement ideas through the platform.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Airtable?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Airtable.