Compare liability limitation governance provisions between Uber and DoorDash. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
This provision establishes broad liability limitations for Uber across a wide range of harm categories, including personal injury and property damage. The carve-out for applicable law means enforceability varies by jurisdiction, but as written the clause asserts exclusion of most categories of damages users might seek.
Consumer impact
Under this clause, claims against Uber for damages resulting from use of the services are limited to direct damages only, with indirect, consequential, and punitive damages excluded to the extent permitted by law. Personal injury and property damage claims are included in the excluded categories, though applicable law in many jurisdictions may limit the enforceability of personal injury liability waivers.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, UBER SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING LOST PROFITS, LOST DATA, PERSONAL INJURY, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE RELATED TO, IN CONNECTION WITH, OR OTHERWISE RESULTING FROM ANY USE OF THE SERVICES, EVEN IF UBER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
Liability caps restrict the financial remedies available to users if they suffer harm related to DoorDash's Services; the practical scope of this limitation depends on the specific cap amount and applicable law in the user's jurisdiction.
Consumer impact
This provision places limits on DoorDash's financial liability to users, which may restrict the compensation available if a user suffers harm in connection with using the Services; the specific cap and any jurisdictional exceptions cannot be fully assessed from the available document text.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
SECTION 20 OF THIS AGREEMENT CONTAINS PROVISIONS WHICH LIMIT OUR LIABILITY TO YOU.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
DoorDash's privacy policy was reformatted on May 11, 2026, with changes to the document's structura…
AI Difference AnalysisCompliance
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.