No matter what happens, X's maximum financial responsibility to you is capped at $100 or whatever you paid X in the last six months, whichever is more.
This analysis describes what X's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause limits X's total financial exposure to each user to $100 for free users, regardless of the nature or scale of harm claimed, which is a standard but significant limitation on consumer remedies.
Users who rely on X for business, communication, or content monetization and experience loss due to service disruption, account suspension, or data issues are contractually limited to recovering no more than $100 from X (or their paid amount in the prior six months) under this provision. The practical enforceability of this cap may vary by jurisdiction, particularly in the EU where consumer protection law may limit such waivers.
How other platforms handle this
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, in no event will Synthesia's aggregate liability to you under or in connection with this Agreement exceed the total fees paid or payable by you to Synthesia in the twelve (12) month period immediately preceding the event giving rise to the claim. In...
Google's total liability to you for any claims under these terms, including for any implied warranties, is limited to the amount you paid us to use the Gemini API (or, if we choose, to supplying you the services again) in the 12 months before the breach.
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, DUOLINGO SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, OR ANY LOSS OF PROFITS OR REVENUES, WHETHER INCURRED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, OR ANY LOSS OF DATA, USE, GOODWILL, OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES, RESUL...
Monitoring
X has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Depending on your country of residence, we may not be liable for certain types of damages as described in the agreement, and in any event, our aggregate liability shall not exceed the greater of $100 USD or the amount you paid us, if any, in the past six months for the Services giving rise to the claim.— Excerpt from X's X Terms of Service
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Liability limitation clauses of this type are common in US platform agreements and are generally enforceable under applicable state contract law, subject to unconscionability doctrine. In the EU, the Consumer Rights Directive and national consumer protection statutes may limit the enforceability of such caps against consumers. The UK Consumer Rights Act 2015 similarly restricts exclusion of liability in consumer contracts. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The $100 cap applies to free users and is a standard platform provision, but may face enforceability challenges in EU and UK jurisdictions for consumer-facing claims. For business account users with material platform dependency, this cap may significantly constrain recoverable damages. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK users are subject to separate terms that may carry different liability treatment; this cap appears in the non-EU section of the document. California's consumer protection framework (CLRA) and certain state-level unfair business practice statutes may impose limits on enforcement of damage caps in specific contexts. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations using X as part of commercial operations or API-dependent workflows should note that contractual recovery for service disruption is capped at $100 under these terms, which may not align with actual business loss exposure. Vendor agreements that depend on X API access should be reviewed accordingly. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should assess whether this cap is adequately disclosed to business users and whether it interacts with any negotiated API or commercial agreements that may supersede standard ToS liability terms.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause limits X's total financial exposure to each user to $100 for free users, regardless of the nature or scale of harm claimed, which is a standard but significant limitation on consumer remedies.
Users who rely on X for business, communication, or content monetization and experience loss due to service disruption, account suspension, or data issues are contractually limited to recovering no more than $100 from X (or their paid amount in the prior six months) under this provision. The practical enforceability of this cap may vary by jurisdiction, particularly in the EU …
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 4 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by X.