The agreement requires that all disputes be resolved on an individual basis only, and users agree not to bring or participate in class actions, private attorney general actions, or any representative proceeding against Together AI.
This analysis describes what Together AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision requires that any claims against Together AI proceed on an individual basis only. The terms prohibit users from initiating or joining class actions, private attorney general actions, or other representative proceedings.
Interpretive note: Enforceability depends on jurisdiction; California and EU courts may decline to enforce class action waivers under applicable consumer protection or contract law.
Expanded waiver language to explicitly prohibit private attorney general actions and representative proceedings, and clarified that this applies to all forums, not just court proceedings.
View full change record →Under this clause, users agree to pursue any claims against Together AI solely on an individual basis. The agreement prohibits participation in class actions or representative proceedings, which may affect the practical viability of pursuing smaller individual claims.
How other platforms handle this
You and Teachable agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You also agree that disputes will only be resolved on an individual basis and not as a class, consolidated, or representative action.
Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California, in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS") then in effect, by ...
WHERE PERMITTED UNDER THE APPLICABLE LAW, YOU AND NETFLIX AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING. Further, where permitted under the applicable law, unless ...
Monitoring
Together AI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"YOU AND TOGETHER EACH AGREE THAT ANY PROCEEDINGS TO RESOLVE OR LITIGATE ANY DISPUTE IN ANY FORUM WILL BE CONDUCTED SOLELY ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS. NEITHER YOU NOR TOGETHER WILL SEEK TO HAVE ANY DISPUTE HEARD AS A CLASS ACTION, PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL ACTION, OR IN ANY OTHER PROCEEDING IN WHICH EITHER PARTY ACTS OR PROPOSES TO ACT IN A REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY.— Excerpt from Together AI's Together AI Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Class action waivers in consumer contracts engage state consumer protection statutes, particularly California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) and Unfair Competition Law (UCL), which have been used to challenge such waivers. The NLRA may limit enforceability of class action waivers in employment-related contexts, though that is unlikely to apply here. The FTC Act's unfair or deceptive practices authority is also relevant. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High for California-based consumer users; Medium for enterprise B2B users. The waiver is common in technology service agreements but has faced judicial scrutiny when applied to consumer relationships with significant power imbalances. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: California courts have in certain circumstances declined to enforce class action waivers found to be unconscionable. EU and UK users are generally protected by statutory rights that preserve access to collective redress mechanisms, and this waiver may be unenforceable in those jurisdictions. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: B2B customers should confirm whether this waiver applies to commercial disputes or is limited to consumer contexts, and should consider negotiating carve-outs in enterprise agreements. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Organizations subject to California law should assess whether this waiver is disclosed adequately to end users if they are deploying Together AI as part of a downstream product or service.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision requires that any claims against Together AI proceed on an individual basis only. The terms prohibit users from initiating or joining class actions, private attorney general actions, or other representative proceedings.
Under this clause, users agree to pursue any claims against Together AI solely on an individual basis. The agreement prohibits participation in class actions or representative proceedings, which may affect the practical viability of pursuing smaller individual claims.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 85 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Together AI.