Provision record
Stash · Stash Terms of Use (Superseded URL) · View original document ↗

Exclusive jurisdiction in New York courts

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 272 of 352 platforms

Key Facts

What does Stash require users to irrevocably submit to?
Stash requires users to irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and the federal courts in the Southern District of New York for any legal action.
Does Stash require users to irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and the federal courts in the Southern District of New York for any legal action?
Stash requires users to irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and the federal courts in the Southern District of New York for any legal action.
Get alerted the next time Stash changes these terms. Follow Stash →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Stash Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Follow Stash →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

This analysis describes what Stash's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

By irrevocably fixing jurisdiction, users who live outside New York are required to litigate in New York courts and cannot contest that venue choice.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

If you have a legal dispute with Stash, you are required to bring it exclusively in New York State courts or the Southern District of New York federal courts, and you cannot challenge that venue.

How other platforms handle this

Weights & Biases Medium

For any dispute relating to this Agreement, the parties consent to personal jurisdiction and the exclusive venue of the courts in New York County, New York.

Perplexity AI Medium

it shall be adjudicated exclusively by the state and federal courts located in San Francisco County, California.

Sony PlayStation Medium

Any dispute not subject to arbitration and not initiated in small claims court may be brought by either party in a court of competent jurisdiction in either the Superior Courts for the State of California...or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Stash has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Follow Stash → Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
you and we agree and irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York and...of the federal courts in the Southern District of New York with respect to any legal action...

Excerpt from Stash's Terms of Use (Superseded URL)

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Stash Terms of Use (Superseded URL)
Entity
Stash
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 12, 2026
Last verified
July 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-071106
Document ID
CA-D-00416
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
f6c4222644d3d4af9e95d5fb5b403d1cb9ec20fb305f60ff15404a69f6490542
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 14:17 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Stash
Document: Stash Terms of Use (Superseded URL)
Record ID: CA-P-071106
Captured: 2026-07-12 14:17:51 UTC
SHA-256: f6c4222644d3d4af…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/stash/stash-terms-of-use-superseded-url/provision/CA-P-071106/exclusive-jurisdiction-in-new-york-courts/
Accessed: July 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention

Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Stash's Exclusive jurisdiction in New York courts clause do?

By irrevocably fixing jurisdiction, users who live outside New York are required to litigate in New York courts and cannot contest that venue choice.

How does this clause affect you?

If you have a legal dispute with Stash, you are required to bring it exclusively in New York State courts or the Southern District of New York federal courts, and you cannot challenge that venue.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 272 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Stash?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Stash.