This analysis describes what Snapchat's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
We may (but are not obligated to) use automated systems and human reviewers to record, monitor, analyse, modify, disable and, store and review use of our Interactive Features...
We use your personal information to improve and enhance our Services, including through the use of various technologies (e.g., business intelligence tools, machine learning systems, and artificial intelligence), personalize content and features to your interests and goals...
the Company reserves the right, but not the obligation, to review or monitor Inputs and Outputs using automated and manual tools.
"you must not...use Inputs that contain or make use of...content that you do not have permission to use, would violate the rights of others, or has otherwise been unlawfully obtainedExcerpt from Snapchat's Terms of Service
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “you must not...use Inputs that contain or make use of...content that you do not have permission to use, would violate the rights of others, or has otherwise been unlawfully obtained”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 217 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Snapchat.