“ALL CLAIMS AND DISPUTES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THIS ARBITRATION AGREEMENT MUST BE ARBITRATED OR LITIGATED ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS AND NOT ON A CLASS BASIS. CLAIMS OF MORE THAN ONE CUSTOMER OR USER CANNOT BE ARBITRATED OR LITIGATED JOINTLY...”
This analysis describes what Snapchat's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Prohibiting class and joint proceedings means each user must pursue claims individually, which can make low-value claims economically impractical to bring.
Interpretive note: The excerpt is truncated. Additional conditions or exceptions to the class waiver may be present in the full clause.
The updated terms establish mandatory age verification as a condition of account creation and authorize Snapchat to lock or delete accounts if users do not meet applicable age requirements in their jurisdiction. The revised content moderation language expands Snapchat's authority to review, moderate, or remove content in its sole discretion and explicitly states the company will not be liable for these actions. An appeals process is introduced, but decisions remain subject to Snapchat's sole discretion. You can review the prior Terms of Service on Snapchat's support site, which apply until September 21, 2026.
View change record →The reader cannot join a class action or a consolidated proceeding against Snapchat for claims within the scope of the Arbitration Agreement; each claim must be pursued individually.
How other platforms handle this
if a court decides that any of the provisions in the Prohibition of Class and Representative Actions...is invalid or unenforceable because it would prevent the exercise of a non-waivable right to pursue public injunctive relief...
13.4 If any part of terms of this Section 12 is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the remainder will remain in effect, except that if a finding of partial illegality or unenforceability would allow class arbitration, class action, or representative action, this entire dispute resolution section ...
If, after exhaustion of all appeals, any of these prohibitions...are found to be unenforceable with respect to a particular claim or request for relief...then such a claim or request for relief will be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction...
"ALL CLAIMS AND DISPUTES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THIS ARBITRATION AGREEMENT MUST BE ARBITRATED OR LITIGATED ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS AND NOT ON A CLASS BASIS. CLAIMS OF MORE THAN ONE CUSTOMER OR USER CANNOT BE ARBITRATED OR LITIGATED JOINTLY...Excerpt from Snapchat's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Prohibiting class and joint proceedings means each user must pursue claims individually, which can make low-value claims economically impractical to bring.
The reader cannot join a class action or a consolidated proceeding against Snapchat for claims within the scope of the Arbitration Agreement; each claim must be pursued individually.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Snapchat.