Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
The agreement requires that most disputes between the user and Snap be resolved through mandatory binding arbitration rather than court proceedings, and both parties waive the right to participate in class-action lawsuits or class-wide arbitration, subject to a stated opt-out right.
This analysis describes what Snapchat's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision requires individual arbitration for most disputes, which means that users cannot bring or join class-action claims against Snap in court. The document states an opt-out right exists and that the clause may not apply depending on the user's location, but the specific opt-out procedure and timeline are referenced in the arbitration clause section of the full Terms, which was not fully reproduced in the provided document text.
Interpretive note: The specific opt-out procedure, deadline, and the enumerated categories of disputes excluded from mandatory arbitration are referenced in the full arbitration clause section, which was not fully reproduced in the provided document text, creating uncertainty about the complete operational scope of this provision.
Under this clause, the agreement requires disputes to proceed through individual mandatory binding arbitration, and both the user and Snap waive participation in class-action lawsuits or class-wide arbitration, subject to an opt-out right described elsewhere in the Terms and potential jurisdictional limitations.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Mandatory Binding Arbitration and Class Action Waiver and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Snapchat has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"ARBITRATION NOTICE: THESE TERMS CONTAIN AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE A LITTLE LATER ON. YOU AND SNAP AGREE THAT, EXCEPT FOR CERTAIN TYPES OF DISPUTES MENTIONED IN THAT ARBITRATION CLAUSE, DISPUTES BETWEEN US WILL BE RESOLVED BY MANDATORY BINDING ARBITRATION, AND YOU AND SNAP WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN A CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT OR CLASS-WIDE ARBITRATION. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO OPT OUT OF ARBITRATION AS EXPLAINED IN THAT ARBITRATION CLAUSE.Excerpt from Snapchat's Terms of Service
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The Federal Arbitration Act governs the enforceability of mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer contracts in the United States. The FTC and CFPB have both issued guidance and taken enforcement positions regarding mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer agreements. The Consumer Financial Protection Act and various state consumer protection statutes may limit the enforceability of class action waivers in specific contexts. State-level limitations on mandatory arbitration in consumer contracts exist in California and other jurisdictions. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. Mandatory arbitration with a class action waiver is a provision that limits the procedural remedies available to users with disputes against Snap. The document acknowledges that the clause may not apply in all jurisdictions, which creates a compliance monitoring obligation to ensure enforcement practices align with applicable law in each relevant geography. JURISDICTION FLAGS: California courts have periodically scrutinized the enforceability of class action waivers and arbitration clauses in consumer contracts under the state's unconscionability doctrine. EU and UK users are governed by the Snap Group Limited Terms of Service rather than this document, and mandatory arbitration clauses are generally unenforceable in EU consumer contracts under applicable consumer protection directives. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations that enter into agreements with Snap on behalf of their employees or users should assess whether the mandatory arbitration clause binds those users and whether any conflict exists with the organization's own dispute resolution policies or indemnification obligations. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should calendar the arbitration opt-out deadline upon acceptance of updated Terms and ensure that any opt-out is submitted via the method specified in the full arbitration clause. The complaint filing window referenced in Section 7, requiring complaints to be submitted within six months of a relevant decision, should also be evaluated for consistency with applicable statutes of limitations.
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
This provision requires individual arbitration for most disputes, which means that users cannot bring or join class-action claims against Snap in court. The document states an opt-out right exists and that the clause may not apply depending on the user's location, but the specific opt-out procedure and timeline are referenced in the arbitration clause section of the full Terms, which …
Under this clause, the agreement requires disputes to proceed through individual mandatory binding arbitration, and both the user and Snap waive participation in class-action lawsuits or class-wide arbitration, subject to an opt-out right described elsewhere in the Terms and potential jurisdictional limitations.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Snapchat.