Provision record
Slack · Slack Privacy Policy · View original document ↗

Unresolved APEC Concerns Routed To Third-Party Dispute Provider

Common · 196 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Slack and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Slack's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

Before either of us files a claim against the other, we both agree to try to resolve the Dispute informally...If we are unable to resolve a Dispute within 60 days, either of us has the right to initiate arbitration.

Anyscale

You agree with us that, if either of us has concerns, we must first work together to resolve any dispute informally without resorting to legal action. You agree to contact us at legal@anyscale.com...

Postman

The services of JAMS are provided at no cost to you.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
If you have an unresolved privacy or data use concern related to our APEC CBPR or PRP certifications that we have not addressed satisfactorily, you may contact our third-party dispute resolution provider.

Excerpt from Slack's Privacy Policy

Provision details

Document information
Document
Slack Privacy Policy
Entity
Slack
Date stated by the document
July 5, 2023
As printed in Slack’s text (version CA-V-006675), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
March 19, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006675, captured Sept. 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-032072
Document ID
CA-D-000192
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006675)
8abde64b364397e3bb6dca82b6f3605fd8448444c9e8738b6f9c400cc031cf32
Analysis generated
May 7, 2026 06:09 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006675, captured Sept. 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Slack
Document: Slack Privacy Policy
Record ID: CA-P-032072
Version: CA-V-006675
Captured: 2026-09-11 00:30:56 UTC
SHA-256: 8abde64b364397e3…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/slack/slack-privacy-policy/provision/CA-P-032072/unresolved-apec-concerns-routed-to-third-party-dispute-provider/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Slack's Unresolved APEC Concerns Routed To Third-Party Dispute Provider clause do?

The clause states: “If you have an unresolved privacy or data use concern related to our APEC CBPR or PRP certifications that we have not addressed satisfactorily, you may contact our third-party dispute resolution provider.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Slack?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Slack.