Disputes between you and Revolut are governed by specific legal rules, and the terms may require you to resolve disputes through particular channels rather than through standard court proceedings.
This analysis describes what Revolut's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause addresses interpretation hierarchy for multilingual versions of the agreement, establishing the English text as the authoritative source document for contractual meaning and enforceability across different language variants.
The updated Terms of Service no longer document the Move Money Rules feature, which previously allowed users to set up automatic fund transfers across account pockets or currency exchanges based on custom conditions. The removal of this documentation means users cannot point to the terms as a reference for how this feature operates, what limits apply, or what fees may be charged. If the feature remains available in the app, its operational parameters are no longer formally described in the binding terms document.
View change record →Consumers may find their legal options restricted if disputes must be resolved under a particular jurisdiction's law or through specific dispute resolution processes rather than local courts.
How other platforms handle this
In the EU and EEA, the choice of Texas governing law shall not apply only where a mandatory consumer protection law explicitly prohibits such choice of law provisions.
For any claims that are not subject to arbitration...U.S. Residents: Delaware law; venue exclusively in the state or federal courts in New Castle County, Delaware
If you reside in the EEA, you can also raise the dispute with an alternative dispute resolution body via the European Commission's Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Platform...
"These terms and conditions are originally written in and governed by the English language. If this text is translated into another language and there is a conflict between the English and non-English versions, the English text will prevail.Excerpt from Revolut's Terms of Service (Superseded URL)
Governing law and dispute resolution clauses should be reviewed for compliance with applicable state consumer protection statutes, some of which limit the enforceability of choice-of-law provisions against consumers.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This clause addresses interpretation hierarchy for multilingual versions of the agreement, establishing the English text as the authoritative source document for contractual meaning and enforceability across different language variants.
Consumers may find their legal options restricted if disputes must be resolved under a particular jurisdiction's law or through specific dispute resolution processes rather than local courts.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Revolut.