The English version of these terms is always the legally binding version — if you read a translation and it says something different from the English version, the English version wins.
This analysis describes what Revolut's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause creates a single authoritative text for dispute interpretation and compliance purposes, ensuring consistent application of contractual obligations across different language markets where Revolut operates.
The updated Terms of Service no longer document the Move Money Rules feature, which previously allowed users to set up automatic fund transfers across account pockets or currency exchanges based on custom conditions. The removal of this documentation means users cannot point to the terms as a reference for how this feature operates, what limits apply, or what fees may be charged. If the feature remains available in the app, its operational parameters are no longer formally described in the binding terms document.
View change record →If you read Revolut's terms in a language other than English and there is any difference between the translation and the English original, the English version is what legally applies — meaning translated terms cannot be relied upon if they say something different.
How other platforms handle this
In the EU and EEA, the choice of Texas governing law shall not apply only where a mandatory consumer protection law explicitly prohibits such choice of law provisions.
For any claims that are not subject to arbitration...U.S. Residents: Delaware law; venue exclusively in the state or federal courts in New Castle County, Delaware
These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of California and the United States without regard to conflicts of laws provisions
"These terms and conditions are originally written in and governed by the English language. If this text is translated into another language and there is a conflict between the English and non-English versions, the English text will prevail.Excerpt from Revolut's Terms of Service (Superseded URL)
(1) REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: Language supremacy clauses in consumer financial contracts may engage state consumer protection requirements for disclosures in languages other than English where a significant portion of customers are non-English-speaking.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause creates a single authoritative text for dispute interpretation and compliance purposes, ensuring consistent application of contractual obligations across different language markets where Revolut operates.
If you read Revolut's terms in a language other than English and there is any difference between the translation and the English original, the English version is what legally applies — meaning translated terms cannot be relied upon if they say something different.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Revolut.