You agree to pay Pinterest's legal costs and defend Pinterest if your use of the service, your content, or your violation of the terms causes Pinterest to face a legal claim.
This analysis describes what Pinterest's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision requires users to bear the cost of defending Pinterest against legal claims arising from user content or conduct, which could create significant financial exposure for individual users whose content generates third-party claims.
Interpretive note: The enforceability of consumer-facing indemnification clauses varies by jurisdiction; EEA and UK unfair contract terms frameworks may limit or negate this obligation for consumer users.
If your content or activities on Pinterest result in a third party making a legal claim against Pinterest, the terms require you to indemnify Pinterest for its legal fees and any resulting liability, which could be financially significant depending on the nature of the claim.
How other platforms handle this
You agree, to the extent permitted under applicable law, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Tinder, our affiliates, and their and our respective officers, directors, agents, and employees from and against any and all complaints, demands, claims, damages, losses, costs, liabilities and expenses, ...
You will indemnify and hold us (including our parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, employees and agents) harmless from any claim or demand, including reasonable legal fees, made by any third party due to or arising out of your breach of this User Agreement, your improper ...
You will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless OpenSea and the OpenSea Parties from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, judgments, awards, losses, costs, expenses, and fees (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or relating to (a) your breach of these Terms; (b) your use of t...
Monitoring
Pinterest has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"You will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Pinterest and its officers, directors, employees, and agents, from and against any claims, disputes, demands, liabilities, damages, losses, and costs and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable legal and accounting fees arising out of or in any way connected with (i) your access to or use of the Service, (ii) your Content, or (iii) your violation of these Terms.— Excerpt from Pinterest's Pinterest Terms of Service
1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Consumer-facing indemnification clauses may be subject to scrutiny under the Unfair Contract Terms Directive in the EU and equivalent UK consumer rights legislation, which may render broad indemnification obligations unenforceable against consumers in those jurisdictions. US enforceability varies by state; some states impose limits on indemnification clauses in consumer contracts. The FTC Act may apply if the indemnification clause operates in a way that is unfair or deceptive to consumers. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The indemnification obligation is broad, covering all claims arising from user content or service use. For individual consumers, the practical financial exposure is significant if a content-related claim arises, though Pinterest's enforcement of this clause against individual users is not documented. For business accounts and creators, the exposure is more operationally significant. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EEA and UK consumer protection laws may limit the enforceability of broad indemnification clauses against individual consumers, particularly where the clause creates a significant imbalance in the parties' rights. California courts have in some contexts scrutinized consumer indemnification clauses under the UCL and CLRA. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Business and enterprise accounts using Pinterest should ensure their own legal agreements with content creators or employees address potential indemnification pass-through obligations under this clause. Organizations that post third-party content on Pinterest should assess IP clearance obligations to avoid triggering this indemnification provision. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams advising on social media content strategies should flag this indemnification clause as a risk factor when advising on content posting policies. EEA-based compliance teams should assess whether this clause is enforceable against consumer users under applicable unfair contract terms frameworks.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision requires users to bear the cost of defending Pinterest against legal claims arising from user content or conduct, which could create significant financial exposure for individual users whose content generates third-party claims.
If your content or activities on Pinterest result in a third party making a legal claim against Pinterest, the terms require you to indemnify Pinterest for its legal fees and any resulting liability, which could be financially significant depending on the nature of the claim.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 82 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Pinterest.