Provision record
Perplexity AI · Perplexity Data Processing Addendum · View original document ↗

Customer Obligations and Representations

Medium severity High confidence Explicit document language Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Perplexity AI and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

The DPA requires Customer to represent and warrant that all Personal Data provided to Perplexity was lawfully collected, that Customer holds all necessary consents and authorizations, and that Customer's actions do not render Perplexity's processing a Sale or Share under US Privacy Laws.

This analysis describes what Perplexity AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision shifts compliance responsibility for upstream data collection and lawful basis to Customer, and requires Customer to ensure that data sharing with Perplexity does not trigger Sale or Share classification under CCPA or equivalent US state laws, which would affect Perplexity's Service Provider status.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Aug 16, 2026

Business customers using Perplexity services are now governed by an updated DPA with two material operational changes. First, subprocessor disclosures have shifted from a static document attachment (Annex 2) to a live online list maintained at https://trust.perplexity.ai/subprocessors, with notifications of changes coming through in-product notification or email rather than through formal amendment. Second, certain Perplexity services (specifically Embeddings API and Perplexity Search) now operate under product-specific data postures and terms that control over the main DPA, meaning the data handling for those services may differ from the baseline agreement. Business customers should review the Trust Center list regularly and check for in-product notifications regarding subprocessor changes, as the updated terms no longer require static amendment cycles.

View change record →

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
Jul 9, 2026
First Seen
Jul 9, 2026
Last Seen

Change history

added Jul 23, 2026

This addition shifts compliance burden to the customer by requiring representations that data collection and disclosure were lawful, providing Perplexity with contractual indemnification against misuse of customer-provided data.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

The agreement requires Customer to warrant that all Personal Data provided to Perplexity was collected and processed in compliance with applicable Privacy Laws and that Customer holds all necessary consents, placing responsibility for upstream data legality on the Customer.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Customer Obligations and Representations and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Customer represents and warrants that (a) all Personal Data was collected and at all times processed and maintained by or on behalf of Customer in compliance with all Privacy Laws, including with respect to any obligations to provide notice to and/or obtain consent from individuals and (b) Customer has complied with Privacy Laws in (including having a lawful basis for), and otherwise has all necessary rights, permissions, consents and authorizations for, disclosing the Personal Data to Perplexity and enabling Perplexity to process the Personal Data as set out in the Agreement and this DPA. Customer shall not take any action that would render the provision of Personal Data to Perplexity hereunder a Sale or Share under US Privacy Laws or otherwise render Perplexity not a Service Provider or Processor under US Privacy Laws.

Excerpt from Perplexity AI's Perplexity Data Processing Addendum

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages GDPR Article 28(3) (controller instruction requirements), CCPA Service Provider definitions, and equivalent US state law provisions.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →
  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Provision details

Document information
Document
Perplexity Data Processing Addendum
Entity
Perplexity AI
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 20, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-013630
Document ID
CA-D-00763
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
63330764edf10647a51ca197723ef717b3e1db5fabfb778068184b91e31fc670
Analysis generated
May 20, 2026 22:20 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Perplexity AI
Document: Perplexity Data Processing Addendum
Record ID: CA-P-013630
Captured: 2026-05-20 22:20:53 UTC
SHA-256: 63330764edf10647…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/perplexity-ai/perplexity-data-processing-addendum/provision/CA-P-013630/customer-obligations-and-representations/
Accessed: Aug. 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Perplexity AI's Customer Obligations and Representations clause do?

This provision shifts compliance responsibility for upstream data collection and lawful basis to Customer, and requires Customer to ensure that data sharing with Perplexity does not trigger Sale or Share classification under CCPA or equivalent US state laws, which would affect Perplexity's Service Provider status.

How does this clause affect you?

The agreement requires Customer to warrant that all Personal Data provided to Perplexity was collected and processed in compliance with applicable Privacy Laws and that Customer holds all necessary consents, placing responsibility for upstream data legality on the Customer.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Perplexity AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Perplexity AI.