Perplexity AI · Perplexity API Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Acceptable Use Restrictions

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Uncommon · 13 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Perplexity AI Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

The terms prohibit use of the API for illegal activity, IP infringement, generation of harmful or deceptive content, and actions that could impair Perplexity's infrastructure. Violation of these restrictions may trigger suspension or termination under the unilateral termination clause.

This analysis describes what Perplexity AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision establishes the operational boundaries for permissible API use and defines the conduct categories that may trigger enforcement action, including access suspension or termination. The prohibition on harmful content generation and deceptive practices is relevant to developers building consumer-facing applications powered by the API.

Interpretive note: The term 'objectionable' in the acceptable use restrictions is not defined, creating interpretive ambiguity regarding the scope of enforcement discretion Perplexity retains.

Change history

modified May 27, 2026

Removed competitive use restriction and high-risk application safeguard requirement, but added explicit prohibitions on deceptive practices, misinformation, and infrastructure abuse, shifting focus from competitive harm to content quality and infrastructure protection.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, developers are contractually prohibited from using the API to generate harmful, abusive, or deceptive content, and from using the API in ways that violate applicable law. Violations of these restrictions are grounds for termination of API access under the agreement.

How other platforms handle this

Wise Medium

You may not use our Services for any illegal purpose or in violation of any laws or regulations. You may not use the Services to send money to sanctioned countries or individuals on government watchlists. You may not use the Services for gambling, illegal drugs, weapons, or any other prohibited acti...

Teachable Medium

You agree not to post, upload, publish, submit or transmit any content that: (i) infringes, misappropriates or violates a third party's patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, moral rights or other intellectual property rights, or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violates, or encourages any ...

HubSpot Medium

Customer agrees to comply with HubSpot's Acceptable Use Policy, which is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. HubSpot may update the Acceptable Use Policy from time to time, and any changes will be effective upon posting to HubSpot's website. Customer's continued use of the Services follow...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Perplexity AI has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You may not use the API to: (i) violate any applicable law or regulation; (ii) infringe the intellectual property rights of any third party; (iii) generate content that is harmful, abusive, harassing, defamatory, obscene, or otherwise objectionable; (iv) engage in deceptive practices or misinformation; or (v) use the Services in a manner that could damage, disable, overburden, or impair Perplexity's infrastructure.

— Excerpt from Perplexity AI's Perplexity API Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The prohibition on deceptive practices engages FTC Act Section 5 obligations, particularly for consumer-facing AI applications. The prohibition on IP infringement intersects with copyright law considerations relevant to AI-generated content. EU AI Act prohibited practices provisions may also apply to certain high-risk use cases. The prohibition on harmful content generation is relevant to COPPA compliance where minors may interact with API-powered applications. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The breadth of restricted categories, particularly 'objectionable' content, gives Perplexity discretion to enforce restrictions beyond clearly defined legal prohibitions. This discretionary scope means enforcement criteria may not be fully predictable for developers. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: The prohibition on violating 'applicable law or regulation' creates jurisdiction-dependent obligations, as legal standards for harmful content, privacy, and AI outputs vary significantly across the EU, UK, US, and other markets. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Developers should ensure their own terms of service and content moderation policies are consistent with these restrictions to avoid downstream liability. B2B deployments where API outputs are incorporated into enterprise workflows should assess the content restriction scope against their use case. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Developers building consumer-facing applications should implement content filtering and review mechanisms to ensure API outputs are screened for compliance with these restrictions. Legal teams should monitor how Perplexity defines and enforces 'objectionable' content over time.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has jurisdiction over deceptive practices in consumer-facing AI applications, relevant to the prohibition on using the API for deceptive or misleading outputs.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

CFAA
United States Federal
DMCA
United States Federal
DSA
European Union
Trump Executive Order on AI Policy Framework
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
Perplexity API Terms of Service
Entity
Perplexity AI
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 21, 2026
Last verified
May 21, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-010515
Document ID
CA-D-00761
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
9ba2c4c777b931c48dcc71a3fc86a6cc257d8d795e18f5d220f8ff7a22f065af
Analysis generated
May 21, 2026 05:31 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Perplexity AI
Document: Perplexity API Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-010515
Captured: 2026-05-21 05:31:01 UTC
SHA-256: 9ba2c4c777b931c4…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/perplexity-ai/perplexity-api-terms-of-service/acceptable-use-restrictions/
Accessed: June 27, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Perplexity AI's Acceptable Use Restrictions clause do?

This provision establishes the operational boundaries for permissible API use and defines the conduct categories that may trigger enforcement action, including access suspension or termination. The prohibition on harmful content generation and deceptive practices is relevant to developers building consumer-facing applications powered by the API.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, developers are contractually prohibited from using the API to generate harmful, abusive, or deceptive content, and from using the API in ways that violate applicable law. Violations of these restrictions are grounds for termination of API access under the agreement.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 13 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Perplexity AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Perplexity AI.