Perplexity AI · Perplexity Acceptable Use Policy · View original document ↗

Election Integrity and Disinformation Prohibition

Medium severity Low confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Perplexity AI recorded 9 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for Perplexity AI Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

The policy prohibits using the platform to generate political rhetoric intended to alter political views or sow division, political advertising or propaganda, content targeting based on political ideology, disinformation, fake news, or content that could undermine election integrity.

This analysis describes what Perplexity AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision contains several broadly framed categories, including 'rhetoric that could unduly alter people's political views' and content that could 'sow division,' that are not defined in the document. These categories create significant enforcement discretion for Perplexity and may affect users engaged in legitimate political commentary, journalism, academic research, or civic education. The disinformation prohibition also engages emerging platform content liability frameworks including the EU Digital Services Act.

Interpretive note: Key terms including 'unduly alter political views,' 'sow division,' 'disinformation,' and 'undermine the integrity of elections' are not defined in the document, creating significant ambiguity regarding the scope and application of this prohibition.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under these terms, Perplexity may determine at its discretion that political, journalistic, or civic content violates this provision, and the absence of defined thresholds means enforcement scope is determined unilaterally by the platform. The agreement does not specify a formal process for users to contest content decisions made under this clause.

How other platforms handle this

Midjourney Medium

Do not generate images for political campaigns or to try to influence the outcome of an election. Do not generate images to spread misinformation or disinformation.

Redfin Medium

You may not automatedly crawl or query the Services for any purpose or by any means (including, without limitation, screen and database scraping, spiders, robots, crawlers and any other automated activity with the purpose of obtaining information from the Services) unless you have received prior exp...

PayPal Medium

relate to transactions involving (f) the promotion of hate, violence, racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory or the financial exploitation of a crime... (i) involve offering or receiving payments for the purpose of bribery or corruption.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Perplexity AI has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You may not use Perplexity to generate rhetoric that could unduly alter people's political views, sow division, or be used for political ads, propaganda, or targeting strategies based on political ideology. You may not use Perplexity to generate disinformation or fake news that could deceive the public. You may not use Perplexity to undermine the integrity of elections.

— Excerpt from Perplexity AI's Perplexity Acceptable Use Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages the EU Digital Services Act, which imposes obligations on very large online platforms regarding systemic risk from disinformation and election integrity, and may require evaluation under FEC regulations regarding political advertising if the platform is used for political communications. The FTC Act's unfair practices framework may also apply if enforcement of this provision is applied inconsistently. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The undefined nature of 'rhetoric that could unduly alter political views' and 'disinformation' creates broad enforcement discretion. This is operationally significant for media organizations, political campaigns, academic researchers, and civic technology developers using the API. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU operators face heightened exposure under the Digital Services Act's disinformation risk assessment obligations. US political campaign operators should assess FEC implications of using AI-generated content in political communications. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: API integrators in media, civic technology, and political research sectors should seek written clarification from Perplexity on how these categories are operationally defined and enforced to avoid unexpected service interruption. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Organizations using Perplexity for news summarization, political research, or civic engagement tools should document use case justifications and assess whether their workflows could be characterized as generating 'disinformation' or election-undermining content under Perplexity's enforcement discretion.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has jurisdiction over unfair or deceptive practices by technology platforms, including inconsistent or opaque enforcement of stated content policies.
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    State attorneys general may have jurisdiction over consumer protection claims arising from inconsistent enforcement of platform content policies affecting political speech.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

CFAA
United States Federal
DMCA
United States Federal
DSA
European Union
Trump Executive Order on AI Policy Framework
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
Perplexity Acceptable Use Policy
Entity
Perplexity AI
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 20, 2026
Last verified
May 20, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-012359
Document ID
CA-D-00760
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
7bfdad247054fa80660dae6d14647626500cc2509c4f467654bf43cdcb45f3e4
Analysis generated
May 20, 2026 20:27 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Perplexity AI
Document: Perplexity Acceptable Use Policy
Record ID: CA-P-012359
Captured: 2026-05-20 20:27:56 UTC
SHA-256: 7bfdad247054fa80…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/perplexity-ai/perplexity-acceptable-use-policy/election-integrity-and-disinformation-prohibition/
Accessed: June 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Perplexity AI's Election Integrity and Disinformation Prohibition clause do?

This provision contains several broadly framed categories, including 'rhetoric that could unduly alter people's political views' and content that could 'sow division,' that are not defined in the document. These categories create significant enforcement discretion for Perplexity and may affect users engaged in legitimate political commentary, journalism, academic research, or civic education. The disinformation prohibition also engages emerging platform content …

How does this clause affect you?

Under these terms, Perplexity may determine at its discretion that political, journalistic, or civic content violates this provision, and the absence of defined thresholds means enforcement scope is determined unilaterally by the platform. The agreement does not specify a formal process for users to contest content decisions made under this clause.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Perplexity AI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Perplexity AI.