8 Total
1 High severity
7 Medium severity
0 Low severity
Summary

This is Perplexity AI's Acceptable Use Policy, which sets out what users are and are not permitted to do when using the Perplexity AI search and answer platform. The policy prohibits generating or facilitating content including child sexual abuse material, instructions for weapons capable of mass casualties, targeted harassment, election disinformation, and content that falsely presents AI-generated text as human-authored in deceptive contexts. The policy also states that Perplexity may suspend or terminate a user's access for violations and that continued use of the service after policy updates constitutes acceptance of the revised terms.

Technical / Legal Breakdown

This document is Perplexity AI's Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), which governs permitted and prohibited uses of Perplexity's AI-powered search and answer platform, operating alongside the company's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. The policy states that users must not use the service to generate content that facilitates violence, produces CSAM or sexual content involving minors, enables weapons of mass destruction, spreads disinformation, violates privacy, engages in illegal discrimination, or circumvents the platform's safety mechanisms, and the terms reserve to Perplexity the right to suspend or terminate access for violations. The AUP includes a broad prohibition on using the platform to 'undermine the integrity of elections' and to generate 'disinformation,' categories that lack precise definitional boundaries in the document and may create interpretive ambiguity in enforcement; the policy also explicitly prohibits using outputs to claim AI-generated content is human-generated in contexts that could deceive, which engages emerging AI transparency obligations. The policy engages the FTC Act regarding unfair or deceptive practices, COPPA given that the service is not directed at children under 13, and potentially the EU AI Act given Perplexity's international availability, as the AUP's prohibitions on high-risk AI outputs interact with EU AI Act obligations for providers of general-purpose AI systems. Compliance teams should note that the AUP explicitly states it may be updated and that continued use constitutes acceptance, which raises consent mechanism considerations under GDPR and CCPA for material policy changes.

Institutional Analysis

Institutional analysis available with Compliance

Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Compliance.

Start Compliance free trial
High — 1 provision
Medium — 7 provisions

Monitoring

Perplexity AI has updated this document before.

Monitor includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?

Compliance includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.

Start Compliance free trial

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Prohibition on Child Sexual Abuse Material and Minor-Protective Content Rules and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Mapped Governance Frameworks

CFAA
United States Federal
View official text ↗
DMCA
United States Federal
View official text ↗
DSA
European Union
View official text ↗
Trump Executive Order on AI Policy Framework
US
View official text ↗
Archival ProvenanceSource & Archival Record
Last Captured May 18, 2026 00:09 UTC
Capture Method Automated scheduled archival capture
Document ID CA-D-000760
Version ID CA-V-002695
SHA-256 ff40c6f81d11028b8c05d33a96deec177b7f699288f831af0c8d97183243c80b
✓ Snapshot stored ✓ Text extracted ✓ Change verified ✓ Hash verified

Governance Monitoring

Monitor governance changes across the platforms you rely on.

Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.

Create free account Compare plans