The policy prohibits using OpenAI services to create cyberweapons, malicious code, or tools designed to cause significant damage to computer systems, networks, or data.
This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This prohibition applies to all users and API operators, and covers both direct creation of malicious software and providing technical assistance that enables cyberattacks causing significant harm.
Interpretive note: Verbatim text could not be extracted from the binary PDF. The provision is inferred from document metadata and publicly available OpenAI Usage Policy language consistent with this document version.
Users who attempt to use OpenAI tools to develop ransomware, exploits, or other cyberweapons are in violation of this policy and subject to account termination, regardless of stated purpose.
How other platforms handle this
You may not use Runway's tools to create content that promotes, glorifies, or facilitates acts of terrorism, mass violence, or genocide, or that could be used to provide material support to individuals or organizations engaged in such activities.
Customer will not, and will not permit any other person (including any End User) to: ... (d) attempt to reverse engineer, decompile, or otherwise attempt to discover the source code or underlying components (e.g., algorithms, weights, or systems) of the Mistral AI Products, including using the Outpu...
You may not use the Services to attempt to circumvent, disable, or otherwise interfere with safety-related features of the Services, including features that prevent or restrict the generation of certain types of content.
Monitoring
OpenAI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
1. REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision intersects with the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), and equivalent EU legislation under the Directive on Attacks Against Information Systems. The FBI Cyber Division and CISA are relevant enforcement authorities in the US context. The EU Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) and national cybersecurity authorities are relevant in EU jurisdictions. 2. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High for cybersecurity firms, penetration testing companies, and security researchers who may operate in edge cases near this boundary. The policy's scope regarding legitimate security research purposes is not fully defined in the available document text, creating interpretive ambiguity for defensive security use cases. 3. JURISDICTION FLAGS: Heightened exposure in the EU under the NIS2 Directive, which places obligations on operators of essential services. US federal contractors have additional obligations under NIST cybersecurity frameworks. The scope of legitimate security research exceptions may vary by jurisdiction. 4. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Cybersecurity companies and penetration testing firms using the OpenAI API should obtain written clarification on the scope of permissible security research use cases. API terms of service for security tooling customers may require additional contractual representations. 5. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Operators in the cybersecurity sector should implement monitoring to detect and block requests for malicious code generation. Compliance programs should address the boundary between permissible security research assistance and prohibited cyberweapon development, particularly in the context of red-teaming and vulnerability research.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This prohibition applies to all users and API operators, and covers both direct creation of malicious software and providing technical assistance that enables cyberattacks causing significant harm.
Users who attempt to use OpenAI tools to develop ransomware, exploits, or other cyberweapons are in violation of this policy and subject to account termination, regardless of stated purpose.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.