This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users cannot bring claims relating to the Terms or Services in court; arbitration is the mandatory and final forum for all such disputes regardless of when the claim arose.
Interpretive note: The excerpt contains an ellipsis indicating omitted language that may define procedural requirements or exclusions. The canonical claim reflects only the language explicitly provided.
Users are required to submit all claims relating to the Terms or Services, including those that arose before the current agreement, to final and binding arbitration rather than court.
How other platforms handle this
except disputes relating to the enforcement or validity of your, your licensors', our, or our licensors' intellectual property rights
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
all Disputes arising out of or relating to the Class Action Waiver, including any claim that all or part of the Class Action Waiver is unenforceable...shall be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction and not by an arbitrator...
Monitoring
OpenAI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"You and OpenAI agree to resolve any claims arising out of or relating to these Terms or our Services, regardless of when the claim arose...through final and binding arbitration.— Excerpt from OpenAI's Terms of Use (ROW)
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
Users cannot bring claims relating to the Terms or Services in court; arbitration is the mandatory and final forum for all such disputes regardless of when the claim arose.
Users are required to submit all claims relating to the Terms or Services, including those that arose before the current agreement, to final and binding arbitration rather than court.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 207 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.