The document authorizes OpenAI to engage third-party sub-processors to carry out specific processing activities on Customer Data, with the sub-processors' identities, countries, and roles disclosed in the list.
This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes the contractual and operational basis for Customer Data flowing beyond OpenAI's own infrastructure to third-party vendors. Enterprise customers conducting vendor risk assessments or data flow mapping must account for each named sub-processor as a separate data handling entity with its own jurisdictional and security profile.
The agreement establishes that Customer Data submitted through OpenAI's API and enterprise services may be processed not only by OpenAI but also by the third-party sub-processors named in this list, each performing specific defined activities. Business customers are responsible for ensuring that this sub-processing arrangement is compatible with their own data protection obligations and contractual commitments to their end users.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Third-Party Sub-processor Engagement and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
OpenAI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"sub-processors that may process Customer Data under the OpenAI Data Processing Agreement, including their processing activities— Excerpt from OpenAI's OpenAI Sub-Processor List
1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: GDPR Article 28(4) requires that where a processor engages a sub-processor, the sub-processor must be bound by equivalent data protection obligations as those imposed on the main processor. Customers relying on the OpenAI DPA should confirm that OpenAI's sub-processor contracts include these flow-down obligations. The UK GDPR contains equivalent requirements. US frameworks including CCPA impose analogous service provider contractual obligations. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The engagement of multiple sub-processors across different jurisdictions creates a distributed data processing chain that enterprise customers must map and assess. The document discloses the existence and identity of sub-processors but does not reproduce the contractual terms between OpenAI and each sub-processor, limiting customers' ability to independently verify compliance without requesting additional documentation. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: Sub-processors located in countries without EU adequacy decisions require Standard Contractual Clauses or another approved transfer mechanism. Customers should identify which listed sub-processors are located in such countries and confirm the applicable transfer instrument. US-based sub-processors processing EU Customer Data require particular attention given the current EU-US Data Privacy Framework and any customer-specific transfer mechanism requirements. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise procurement teams should request confirmation from OpenAI that binding data processing agreements incorporating GDPR Article 28-equivalent obligations are in place with each listed sub-processor. Where customers' own contracts with their end users impose sub-processor restrictions or notification obligations, those commitments must be reconciled against this list. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should incorporate each named sub-processor into their data processing records, third-party risk assessments, and transfer impact analyses as applicable. Any customer-side restriction on data transfers to specific countries or regions requires cross-referencing against sub-processor locations. Teams should also establish a process to review and respond to any future sub-processor change notifications issued under the DPA.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 3 platforms + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes the contractual and operational basis for Customer Data flowing beyond OpenAI's own infrastructure to third-party vendors. Enterprise customers conducting vendor risk assessments or data flow mapping must account for each named sub-processor as a separate data handling entity with its own jurisdictional and security profile.
The agreement establishes that Customer Data submitted through OpenAI's API and enterprise services may be processed not only by OpenAI but also by the third-party sub-processors named in this list, each performing specific defined activities. Business customers are responsible for ensuring that this sub-processing arrangement is compatible with their own data protection obligations and contractual commitments to their end users.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.