This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This risk assessment directly informs the deployment authorization and ongoing monitoring protocols for the model. The medium-risk rating at launch establishes the baseline for required safety monitoring, usage restrictions, and potential adjustment mechanisms throughout the model's operational lifecycle.
This provision establishes that GPT-4o operates under a medium CBRN risk classification, which may inform the terms of service restrictions on biological threat-related queries and the scope of content policy enforcement applicable to users. The rating determines what safeguard mechanisms and use-case limitations apply during normal service operation.
How other platforms handle this
We may use Materials to provide, maintain, and improve the Services and to develop other products and services, including training our models, unless you opt out of training through your account settings. Even if you opt out, we will use Materials for model training when: (1) you provide Feedback to...
AI systems should treat all people fairly. For example, when AI systems are used to help make decisions about medical treatment, loan applications, or employment, they should make the same recommendations to everyone who has similar symptoms, financial situations, or professional qualifications.
Promoting privacy and security, and respecting intellectual property rights.
Monitoring
OpenAI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"GPT-4o does not advance biological threat creation capabilities sufficient to meet our medium risk threshold.— Excerpt from OpenAI's GPT-4o System Card (PDF)
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This risk assessment directly informs the deployment authorization and ongoing monitoring protocols for the model. The medium-risk rating at launch establishes the baseline for required safety monitoring, usage restrictions, and potential adjustment mechanisms throughout the model's operational lifecycle.
This provision establishes that GPT-4o operates under a medium CBRN risk classification, which may inform the terms of service restrictions on biological threat-related queries and the scope of content policy enforcement applicable to users. The rating determines what safeguard mechanisms and use-case limitations apply during normal service operation.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.