This analysis describes what Nintendo's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This establishes that Nintendo's data security obligations do not extend to information in the hands of third parties, leaving users without recourse against Nintendo for third-party breaches.
Nintendo now explicitly discloses that it collects persistent identifiers (IP addresses, device IDs) from child users for operational, security, fraud prevention, and service improvement purposes, and states that contractual restrictions limit how service providers can use this data. Parents gain enhanced transparency by being able to view a named list of third-party games and applications authorized to access their child's account, rather than just managing access through settings. The policy also clarifies that location information may be used for check-ins at Nintendo locations and events in addition to location-based games. You can review and manage which third-party apps have access to your child's account through your Nintendo Account profile settings.
View change record →Nintendo now discloses that it uses location data not only for location-based games and friend connections, but also to enable check-ins at specific events and Nintendo locations, which is a new explicit use case. The policy now details how child user data including persistent identifiers like IP addresses and device IDs are collected and retained, with commitments to delete or de-identify data based on sensitivity and account activity. Parents can now see which third-party apps have been authorized to access their child's account before deciding whether to allow continued access, giving more visibility into connected applications.
View change record →The revised policy simplifies how Nintendo describes data retention, now stating information is retained only as long as reasonably necessary in accordance with applicable law, without prior detail about sensitivity-based retention practices. For child users, the policy no longer explicitly lists persistent identifiers (IP addresses, device identifiers) that Nintendo and service providers collect, removing specific disclosure language that previously detailed collection purposes for child accounts. The policy now indicates it collects error information from both users and devices, broadening the prior language focused on device errors only. The privacy certification body changed from CARU to ESRB, meaning independent audits and enforcement are now administered by the Entertainment Software Rating Board rather than the Children's Advertising Review Unit.
View change record →If a third party collects your information, Nintendo bears no responsibility for securing it.
How other platforms handle this
We have no control over and assume no responsibility for the content, privacy policies or practices of any third party sites or services.
We do not control those websites and are not responsible for their conduct, even if they may provide content co-branded by Cerebras. These websites are governed by their own policies regarding privacy and security, not by this Policy.
Tinder is not responsible for the availability (or lack of availability) of any external websites or resources or their content. Furthermore, Tinder is not responsible for, and does not endorse, any products or services that may be offered by third-party websites...
Monitoring
Nintendo has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"information collected by third parties may not have the same security protections as information you submit to us, and we are not responsible for protecting the security of such information.— Excerpt from Nintendo's Nintendo Privacy Policy
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This establishes that Nintendo's data security obligations do not extend to information in the hands of third parties, leaving users without recourse against Nintendo for third-party breaches.
If a third party collects your information, Nintendo bears no responsibility for securing it.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 289 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Nintendo.