Microsoft · Microsoft Services Agreement (Legacy) · View original document ↗

Governing Law and Jurisdiction

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 202 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Microsoft Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.

This analysis describes what Microsoft's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The governing law selection determines which substantive legal rules apply to contract interpretation, performance obligations, and liability standards. The exclusive jurisdiction clause concentrates litigation in a specific geographic forum, affecting where either party must initiate or defend court proceedings.

Interpretive note: The enforceability of the Washington State choice of law and King County jurisdiction clause may be limited for EU, UK, and other international users under applicable consumer protection law in those jurisdictions.

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
Apr 3, 2026
First Seen
May 11, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 401 other provisions on other platforms.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Users accept that disputes will be governed by Washington law and that any court proceedings must occur in King County, Washington courts. This provision establishes the legal framework and procedural venue for litigation that is not subject to the arbitration clause.

How other platforms handle this

Cloudflare Medium

These Terms shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of law rules, and the federal laws of the United States. Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California...

MetaMask Medium

These Terms of Service and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with them or their subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice o...

Target Medium

These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provisions. Any disputes not subject to arbitration will be resolved in the state or federal courts located in Hennepin County, Minnesota.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Microsoft has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
The laws of the State of Washington, U.S.A., govern these terms and any claims and disputes (whether contract, tort, or otherwise) arising out of or relating to these terms or their subject matter. You irrevocably consent to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the state or federal courts in King County, Washington, U.S.A., for all disputes arising out of or relating to these terms that are heard in court (excluding arbitration).

— Excerpt from Microsoft's Microsoft Services Agreement (Legacy)

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Microsoft Services Agreement (Legacy)
Entity
Microsoft
Document last updated
March 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
April 28, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-000015
Document ID
CA-D-00002
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
246226a9dde020cff365053de9faaea24c0f1babf1b6627a58b10222e23e9703
Analysis generated
April 28, 2026 08:17 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Microsoft
Document: Microsoft Services Agreement (Legacy)
Record ID: CA-P-000015
Captured: 2026-04-28 08:17:11 UTC
SHA-256: 246226a9dde020cf…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/microsoft/microsoft-services-agreement-legacy/governing-law-and-jurisdiction/
Accessed: June 10, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Microsoft's Governing Law and Jurisdiction clause do?

The governing law selection determines which substantive legal rules apply to contract interpretation, performance obligations, and liability standards. The exclusive jurisdiction clause concentrates litigation in a specific geographic forum, affecting where either party must initiate or defend court proceedings.

How does this clause affect you?

Users accept that disputes will be governed by Washington law and that any court proceedings must occur in King County, Washington courts. This provision establishes the legal framework and procedural venue for litigation that is not subject to the arbitration clause.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 202 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Microsoft?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Microsoft.