This analysis describes what Marqeta's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Recipient may disclose Discloser's Confidential Information: (i) to the extent that such disclosure is required by applicable law or by the order of a court...provided that...the Recipient promptly notifies the Discloser in writing of such required disclosure...
Either you or we may share confidential information with legal or regulatory authorities if required by law to do so.
prevent or detect violations of our Terms or fraud or abuse of Strava or its users; or (4) protect our operations or our property or other legal rights, including in connection with actual or potential litigation.
"The Receiving Party may also disclose Disclosing Party's Confidential Information to the extent required by Applicable Law or court order, provided that the Receiving Party uses reasonable efforts to limit such disclosure...Excerpt from Marqeta's Terms of Use
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “The Receiving Party may also disclose Disclosing Party's Confidential Information to the extent required by Applicable Law or court order, provided that the Receiving Party uses reasonable efforts to limit such disclosure...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 273 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Marqeta.