Ledger · Ledger Privacy Policy · View original document ↗

International Data Transfers

Medium severity Medium confidence Inferredfromcontext Uncommon · 47 of 325 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Ledger Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Ledger transfers personal data outside the European Economic Area to countries that may not have equivalent data protection laws, using Standard Contractual Clauses as the stated legal mechanism to protect those transfers.

This analysis describes what Ledger's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This language serves as a policy statement rather than a substantive governance provision. It articulates institutional values but does not establish enforceable procedures, limitations, or requirements for cross-border data movement.

Interpretive note: The specific countries of transfer, the list of non-EEA processors, and confirmation of whether 2021 updated SCCs are in use were not visible in the truncated document text.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

High Apr 19, 2026

The updated policy removes explicit language stating that Ledger Recover and Ledger Multisig services are excluded from this privacy policy. Previously, users were directed to separate privacy policies for those services; that direction is now absent. This creates ambiguity about whether this policy now covers those services or whether separate policies still apply. The dramatic reduction in policy length (from 224 to 36 sentences) suggests substantial content was removed, though the specific implications depend on what other sections were condensed or eliminated. You should review the full updated policy to confirm what data practices and service exclusions remain in effect for all Ledger services you use.

View change record →
Medium Apr 2, 2026

Ledger removed language explicitly stating that this privacy policy does not cover Ledger Recover and Ledger Multisig services, and eliminated references to dedicated privacy policies for those services. This creates ambiguity about whether those services are now governed by the main privacy policy or whether separate policies exist but are no longer disclosed in this document. If you use Ledger Recover or Ledger Multisig, you should review the privacy disclosures for those specific services directly, as it is no longer clear from the main privacy policy whether separate protections apply.

View change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Your personal data may be sent to service providers or affiliates located outside the EU, meaning it may be processed in countries with different privacy protections; Standard Contractual Clauses are the stated safeguard, though their practical effectiveness depends on implementation details not visible in this policy.

How other platforms handle this

Tabnine Medium

Tabnine is headquartered in the United States and operates globally. If you are located outside the United States, your personal data may be transferred to and processed in the United States or other countries that may not provide the same level of data protection as your home country. We rely on ap...

Pinterest Medium

Pinterest, Inc. is based in the US. If you live outside the US, your information will be transferred to and processed in the US and other countries where our partners, service providers, and affiliates operate. We use approved data transfer mechanisms, including standard contractual clauses, to ensu...

Windsurf Medium

If you are a resident in the EEA, Switzerland or the UK, then these countries may not necessarily have data protection laws or other similar laws as comprehensive as those in your country. We may transfer Personal Information from the EEA, Switzerland or the UK to the U.S. and other third countries ...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Ledger has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
At Ledger, earning and maintaining our users' trust is a top priority. That's why we are deeply committed not only to protecting your privacy and securing your personal data, but also to being fully transparent about how we handle it.

— Excerpt from Ledger's Ledger Privacy Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: International data transfers from the EEA engage GDPR Chapter V (Articles 44-49), requiring either an adequacy decision, Standard Contractual Clauses, Binding Corporate Rules, or another approved derogation. Post-Schrems II (CJEU Case C-311/18), SCCs must be supplemented by transfer impact assessments where the recipient country's law may undermine the SCC protections. The European Data Protection Board's guidance on supplementary measures is directly applicable. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. Use of SCCs is standard practice, but compliance depends on whether Ledger has adopted the 2021 European Commission updated SCCs and conducted the required transfer impact assessments for each recipient country, particularly for US-based service providers post-Privacy Shield invalidation. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA users are the primary affected population. UK users are subject to UK GDPR transfer rules (International Data Transfer Agreements rather than EU SCCs). Transfers to the US require specific attention given the history of EU-US data transfer framework invalidations, though the EU-US Data Privacy Framework adopted in 2023 provides a new adequacy mechanism for certified US recipients. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: All data processing agreements with non-EEA processors should incorporate current SCCs or applicable equivalent mechanisms. Legal teams should confirm whether US-based analytics and logistics vendors are certified under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, which would simplify transfer compliance. Transfer impact assessments should be documented and updated when vendor locations or processing activities change. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: A transfer mapping exercise should identify all non-EEA recipients, the legal mechanism relied upon for each transfer, and documentation of transfer impact assessments. Compliance teams should verify that SCCs in use are the 2021 updated versions and that module selection reflects the actual controller-processor or controller-controller relationship in each case.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Watcher free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable regulations

Connecticut Data Privacy Act Amendments
US-CT
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
GDPR
European Union
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
US-KY
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism Expansion 2026
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
Ledger Privacy Policy
Entity
Ledger
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
April 27, 2026
Last verified
May 10, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-001471
Document ID
CA-D-00278
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
9a6fc1c6566c5db4f79f71e6b92bfb73f8160ea24b52ecc228c23699f2fbc16b
Analysis generated
April 27, 2026 15:33 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Ledger
Document: Ledger Privacy Policy
Record ID: CA-P-001471
Captured: 2026-04-27 15:33:24 UTC
SHA-256: 9a6fc1c6566c5db4…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/ledger/ledger-privacy-policy/international-data-transfers/
Accessed: May 20, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Professional free trial

Or start with Watcher →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Ledger's International Data Transfers clause do?

This language serves as a policy statement rather than a substantive governance provision. It articulates institutional values but does not establish enforceable procedures, limitations, or requirements for cross-border data movement.

How does this clause affect you?

Your personal data may be sent to service providers or affiliates located outside the EU, meaning it may be processed in countries with different privacy protections; Standard Contractual Clauses are the stated safeguard, though their practical effectiveness depends on implementation details not visible in this policy.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 47 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Ledger?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Ledger.