This analysis describes what Grubhub's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes binding arbitration as the mandatory dispute resolution mechanism for the parties, which operates as a procedural requirement that shapes how contractual disagreements and service-related claims are adjudicated. The exception for small claims court creates a limited pathway outside the arbitration requirement for qualifying claims.
Users who accept these terms agree to resolve disputes through binding arbitration rather than pursuing claims in court or participating in class proceedings, with the exception of claims that qualify for small claims court. This alters the procedural framework under which disputes between the user and Grubhub are addressed.
How other platforms handle this
You and Jasper agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. The Federal Arbitration Act governs the interpretation and enforcement of this Arbitration Agreement. Arbitration will be administered by the Amer...
You and Teachable agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You also agree that disputes will only be resolved on an individual basis and not as a class, consolidated, or representative action.
Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California, in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS") then in effect, by ...
Monitoring
Grubhub has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"PLEASE READ THIS SECTION CAREFULLY. IT AFFECTS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS. YOU AND GRUBHUB AGREE THAT ANY DISPUTE, CLAIM, OR CONTROVERSY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THESE TERMS OR THE BREACH, TERMINATION, ENFORCEMENT, INTERPRETATION, OR VALIDITY THEREOF, OR TO THE USE OF THE SERVICES, WILL BE RESOLVED BY BINDING ARBITRATION BETWEEN YOU AND GRUBHUB RATHER THAN IN COURT, WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: YOU MAY ASSERT CLAIMS IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT IF YOUR CLAIMS QUALIFY.— Excerpt from Grubhub's Grubhub Terms of Use
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes binding arbitration as the mandatory dispute resolution mechanism for the parties, which operates as a procedural requirement that shapes how contractual disagreements and service-related claims are adjudicated. The exception for small claims court creates a limited pathway outside the arbitration requirement for qualifying claims.
Users who accept these terms agree to resolve disputes through binding arbitration rather than pursuing claims in court or participating in class proceedings, with the exception of claims that qualify for small claims court. This alters the procedural framework under which disputes between the user and Grubhub are addressed.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 37 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Grubhub.