This analysis describes what Groq's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause specifies the legal framework and forum for dispute resolution, establishing California as the controlling jurisdiction and San Francisco County courts as the exclusive venue for non-arbitrated claims, which defines the procedural and substantive law applicable to the agreement.
Users agree that any non-arbitrated dispute will be litigated in San Francisco County courts under California law, which determines both the substantive legal standards applied to the dispute and the geographic location where proceedings must occur.
How other platforms handle this
These Terms shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of law rules, and the federal laws of the United States. Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California...
These Terms of Service and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with them or their subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice o...
These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provisions. Any disputes not subject to arbitration will be resolved in the state or federal courts located in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Monitoring
Groq has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"These Terms and any action related thereto will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to its conflict of laws provisions. Except as otherwise expressly provided in these Terms, any dispute that is not subject to arbitration will be resolved exclusively in the state or federal courts sitting in San Francisco County, California.— Excerpt from Groq's Groq Terms of Use
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The clause specifies the legal framework and forum for dispute resolution, establishing California as the controlling jurisdiction and San Francisco County courts as the exclusive venue for non-arbitrated claims, which defines the procedural and substantive law applicable to the agreement.
Users agree that any non-arbitrated dispute will be litigated in San Francisco County courts under California law, which determines both the substantive legal standards applied to the dispute and the geographic location where proceedings must occur.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 202 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Groq.