You give up your right to join a class action lawsuit or group arbitration against Grammarly, meaning any dispute must be handled individually rather than alongside other affected users.
This analysis describes what Grammarly's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Class action waivers significantly reduce practical legal recourse for individual consumers, particularly for smaller-value claims where individual arbitration may not be economically viable.
Interpretive note: Enforceability of class action waivers varies by jurisdiction; EU, UK, and some US state laws may limit the applicability of this provision to users in those locations.
This clause means that if Grammarly's practices affect many users in similar ways, you cannot join with other users to bring a collective claim; each person must pursue any dispute individually, which can be costly and impractical for minor harms. The waiver applies to both court and arbitration proceedings.
How other platforms handle this
You and Teachable agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You also agree that disputes will only be resolved on an individual basis and not as a class, consolidated, or representative action.
Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California, in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS") then in effect, by ...
WHERE PERMITTED UNDER THE APPLICABLE LAW, YOU AND NETFLIX AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING. Further, where permitted under the applicable law, unless ...
Monitoring
Grammarly has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"You and Grammarly each waive any right to a jury trial or to participate in a class action, class arbitration, or representative proceeding of any kind.— Excerpt from Grammarly's Grammarly Terms of Service
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Class action waivers in consumer contracts are subject to ongoing regulatory scrutiny under the FTC Act and state consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has historically examined class action waivers in consumer financial product contexts; while Grammarly is not a financial services provider, the FTC's broader consumer protection mandate is relevant. California courts have at times challenged class action waivers where they are found to be unconscionable, though the FAA generally preempts state law restrictions. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. Class action waivers represent a systematic reduction in consumer collective recourse and are among the most consequential provisions in consumer ToS agreements from a governance perspective. Regulatory posture toward these clauses has been increasingly critical in recent years. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK users may find class action waivers unenforceable under local consumer protection law. Some EU member states and the UK permit collective redress mechanisms that cannot be contractually waived. California's unconscionability doctrine has historically challenged class action waivers, though US federal law (FAA) creates preemption complexity. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise agreements may include separate dispute resolution terms; organizations should confirm whether the class action waiver applies to organizational accounts or only individual consumers. Procurement teams should negotiate the removal or modification of this clause for high-volume enterprise deployments. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should assess whether disclosures about the class action waiver are adequate under applicable state and local law. Consumer advocacy and regulatory scrutiny of this type of provision has increased, and organizations deploying Grammarly as a platform tool should understand the downstream legal exposure for their user base.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
Class action waivers significantly reduce practical legal recourse for individual consumers, particularly for smaller-value claims where individual arbitration may not be economically viable.
This clause means that if Grammarly's practices affect many users in similar ways, you cannot join with other users to bring a collective claim; each person must pursue any dispute individually, which can be costly and impractical for minor harms. The waiver applies to both court and arbitration proceedings.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 86 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Grammarly.