Grammarly · Grammarly Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Mandatory Individual Arbitration

High severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Uncommon · 13 of 325 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Grammarly Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

If you have a dispute with Grammarly, you generally must resolve it through private arbitration rather than by going to court, and you give up your right to a jury trial.

This analysis describes what Grammarly's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Mandatory arbitration means you cannot take Grammarly to court for most disputes, and the process is typically more limited in scope and discovery than litigation, which can disadvantage individual consumers.

Interpretive note: Enforceability varies by jurisdiction; EU and some state-level laws may limit or void mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer contracts, meaning the practical effect of this provision depends on where the user is located.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

This clause removes your default right to litigate disputes with Grammarly in court and requires individual arbitration instead, which limits procedural options available to consumers and may reduce practical recourse for smaller claims. The arbitration agreement can be opted out of within 30 days of first accepting the terms.

What you can do

⚠️ These actions may provide transparency or partial mitigation but may not fully address the underlying issue. Effectiveness varies by jurisdiction and individual circumstances.
  • Opt Out of Arbitration
    Within 30 days
    Send a written opt-out notice to Grammarly's designated arbitration opt-out email address within 30 days of first accepting the Terms of Service. Include your account name and a clear statement that you are opting out of the arbitration agreement.

How other platforms handle this

Unity High

YOU AND UNITY AGREE THAT ANY DISPUTE, CLAIM OR CONTROVERSY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THESE TERMS OR THE BREACH, TERMINATION, ENFORCEMENT, INTERPRETATION OR VALIDITY THEREOF OR THE USE OF THE SERVICES (COLLECTIVELY, "DISPUTES") WILL BE SETTLED BY BINDING ARBITRATION, EXCEPT THAT EACH PARTY RETAIN...

Whoop High

PLEASE READ THIS SECTION CAREFULLY. IT AFFECTS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS. IT PROVIDES FOR RESOLUTION OF MOST DISPUTES THROUGH INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION INSTEAD OF COURT TRIALS AND CLASS ACTIONS. YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO OPT OUT OF THIS ARBITRATION AGREEMENT, AS DESCRIBED BELOW. By agreeing to these Terms, you agree...

OpenAI High

You and OpenAI agree to resolve any claims arising out of or relating to these Terms or our Services through final and binding arbitration, except that you may bring claims in small claims court if they qualify. You may opt out of arbitration within 30 days of agreeing to these Terms by writing to u...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Grammarly has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You and Grammarly agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding individual arbitration, rather than in court, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You are giving up your right to have disputes decided by a judge or jury.

— Excerpt from Grammarly's Grammarly Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer contracts engage the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in the US and are subject to FTC scrutiny under unfair or deceptive practices standards. Several states, including California, have enacted or proposed legislation limiting mandatory arbitration in consumer contexts. For EU users, such clauses may be considered unfair contract terms under the EU Unfair Contract Terms Directive, limiting enforceability in EU jurisdictions. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The mandatory arbitration requirement applies to all users and disputes, with limited exceptions. The agreement specifies binding individual arbitration, which means Grammarly retains the ability to aggregate dispute resolution efficiency while individual users bear the procedural cost and complexity of arbitration proceedings. This is a standard but materially significant provision. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and EEA users may find this clause unenforceable or limited under local consumer protection law, particularly where it prevents access to national courts. California residents should be aware of state-level consumer arbitration protections. UK users post-Brexit face similar unfair terms considerations under the Consumer Rights Act. The practical enforceability of this clause varies materially by jurisdiction. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations entering into Grammarly agreements on behalf of employees or users should assess whether arbitration provisions flow through to individual users or whether enterprise agreements provide alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. B2B contracts may include separate dispute resolution terms that supersede this consumer ToS provision. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should document the arbitration opt-out window and ensure that any organizational onboarding process accounts for the 30-day opt-out period. Consumer-facing deployments should evaluate whether state-specific disclosures are required regarding arbitration. EU-based legal teams should assess whether local law renders this clause inapplicable to their user population.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Watcher free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC monitors consumer protection issues including the fairness and disclosure of mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer-facing terms of service
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    State attorneys general in California and other states may have authority over consumer arbitration clauses under state-level consumer protection statutes
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Grammarly Terms of Service
Entity
Grammarly
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
April 30, 2026
Last verified
May 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-007843
Document ID
CA-D-00457
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
33384f79ac43a7cd9a4eee24fe89a950aeeae73b1bc6a35193d9f97d090212c3
Analysis generated
April 30, 2026 06:10 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Grammarly
Document: Grammarly Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-007843
Captured: 2026-04-30 06:10:31 UTC
SHA-256: 33384f79ac43a7cd…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/grammarly/grammarly-terms-of-service/mandatory-individual-arbitration/
Accessed: May 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Professional free trial

Or start with Watcher →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Grammarly's Mandatory Individual Arbitration clause do?

Mandatory arbitration means you cannot take Grammarly to court for most disputes, and the process is typically more limited in scope and discovery than litigation, which can disadvantage individual consumers.

How does this clause affect you?

This clause removes your default right to litigate disputes with Grammarly in court and requires individual arbitration instead, which limits procedural options available to consumers and may reduce practical recourse for smaller claims. The arbitration agreement can be opted out of within 30 days of first accepting the terms.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 13 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Grammarly?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Grammarly.