Google explicitly refuses to build AI whose main purpose is to injure people, enable illegal surveillance, or violate international law — including refusing to develop autonomous weapons.
This analysis describes what Google's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This restriction defines operational boundaries for Google's AI development and deployment activities. The clause establishes commitments regarding categories of applications that fall outside the scope of Google's AI product development strategy.
For everyday consumers, this restriction means Google has publicly committed not to repurpose consumer AI products into weapons systems or mass surveillance tools — though the commitment is self-enforced with no external audit.
How other platforms handle this
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Kit shall not be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages, or any loss of profits or revenues, whether incurred directly or indirectly, or any loss of data, use, goodwill, or other intangible losses, resulting ...
We have implemented appropriate technical and organizational security measures designed to protect the security of any Personal Information we process. However, despite our safeguards and efforts to secure your information, no electronic transmission over the Internet or information storage technolo...
THE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED 'AS IS' AND 'AS AVAILABLE' WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. GRAMMARLY DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE SERVICES WILL BE UN...
Monitoring
Google has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"We will not design or deploy AI in the following application areas: Weapons or other technologies whose principal purpose or implementation is to cause or directly facilitate injury to people. Technologies that gather or use information for surveillance violating internationally accepted norms. Technologies whose purpose contravenes widely accepted principles of international law and human rights.— Excerpt from Google's Google AI Principles
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: International Humanitarian Law (Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocols) governs autonomous weapons development. UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Group of Governmental Experts on LAWS (Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems) is the relevant international forum. US DoD Directive 3000.09 on Autonomous Weapons Systems. EU AI Act Article 5(1)(f) prohibits AI for real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces except with judicial authorization.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This restriction defines operational boundaries for Google's AI development and deployment activities. The clause establishes commitments regarding categories of applications that fall outside the scope of Google's AI product development strategy.
For everyday consumers, this restriction means Google has publicly committed not to repurpose consumer AI products into weapons systems or mass surveillance tools — though the commitment is self-enforced with no external audit.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Google.