This analysis describes what Google Ads's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
You agree that we may, but have no obligation, to identify you as a customer of ActiveCampaign and that ActiveCampaign may, in its sole discretion, refer to you by name, trade name, trademark, logo and other proprietary marks or words...
This Policy does not apply to Personal Data we process in our role as a data processor or service provider on behalf of our customers and partners.
In the event of any conflict between these Terms of Use and information provided by Customer Service or other portions of our websites, these Terms of Use will control.
"Customer warrants on an ongoing basis that the relevant controller has authorised: (i) the Instructions, (ii) Customer's appointment of Google as another processor, and (iii) Google's engagement of Subprocessors as described in Section 11Excerpt from Google Ads's Data Processing Terms
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “Customer warrants on an ongoing basis that the relevant controller has authorised: (i) the Instructions, (ii) Customer's appointment of Google as another processor, and (iii) Google's engagement of Subprocessors as described in Section 11”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 297 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Google Ads.