This analysis describes what Figma's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Any terms and conditions of any other instrument issued by you in connection with these Terms which are in addition to, inconsistent with or different from these Terms shall be of no force or effect.
If a supplemental agreement conflicts with these Terms, the supplemental agreement controls to the extent of the conflict for the program, feature, or service it governs.
If you believe we have taken action against your content or account in a way that does not comply with these Terms, you have the right to bring a claim for breach of contract under UK law.
"Each party represents and warrants to the other that: (a) the performance of these Terms by the executing party does not violate the terms or conditions of any other agreement to which it is a party...Excerpt from Figma's Terms of Service (Superseded URL)
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “Each party represents and warrants to the other that: (a) the performance of these Terms by the executing party does not violate the terms or conditions of any other agreement to which it is a party...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 297 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Figma.