This analysis describes what Figma's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
You also authorize us to retry any failed authorizations. We may use data provided to us by our partners to determine when to schedule such retries.
If a payment is not successfully processed, due to expiration, insufficient funds, or otherwise, you remain responsible for any uncollected amounts and authorize us to continue billing the Payment Method, as it may be updated.
During the Subscription Period, you will be billed for the Subscription Fees on a recurring basis, as set out on our Platform (Billing Cycle).
"Customer expressly authorizes Figma (via Figma's third-party payment processor) to charge the payment method Customer provides to Figma for the initial payment, subscription renewals, and any other purchases Customer makes within the Figma Platform...Excerpt from Figma's Terms of Service (Superseded URL)
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “Customer expressly authorizes Figma (via Figma's third-party payment processor) to charge the payment method Customer provides to Figma for the initial payment, subscription renewals, and any other purchases Customer makes within the Figma Platform...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 231 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Figma.