Even if Duolingo causes you harm, the most you can recover is what you paid them in the past 12 months or $100, whichever is more — and you cannot recover for indirect losses like lost time or emotional distress.
This analysis describes what Duolingo's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This cap means that even significant harm caused by a platform failure or data breach may result in minimal financial recovery for the average user, particularly free-tier users who have paid nothing.
Interpretive note: EU and UK GDPR impose mandatory compensation rights for data protection violations that are not subject to this contractual cap; enforceability varies by jurisdiction and claim type.
Your financial recovery from Duolingo is capped at your last 12 months of payments or $100, which could be zero for free users, significantly limiting your practical legal remedies if the platform causes you harm.
How other platforms handle this
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Kit shall not be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages, or any loss of profits or revenues, whether incurred directly or indirectly, or any loss of data, use, goodwill, or other intangible losses, resulting ...
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Pinterest shall not be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages, or any loss of profits or revenues, whether incurred directly or indirectly, or any loss of data, use, goodwill, or other intangible losses, res...
You will remain responsible for any amounts you fail to pay in connection with your subscription, including collection costs, bank overdraft fees, collection agency fees, reasonable attorneys' fees, and arbitration or court costs.
Monitoring
Duolingo has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT WILL DUOLINGO, ITS AFFILIATES, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, SUPPLIERS, OR LICENSORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA, OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF DUOLINGO HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES). IN NO EVENT SHALL DUOLINGO'S TOTAL LIABILITY TO YOU EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID BY YOU TO DUOLINGO IN THE TWELVE MONTHS PRIOR TO THE EVENT GIVING RISE TO YOUR CLAIM, OR $100, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.— Excerpt from Duolingo's Duolingo Terms of Service
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Liability caps are standard in consumer technology agreements and are generally enforceable in the U.S. under state contract law. However, EU consumer protection law and the GDPR impose mandatory liability standards for data breaches and violations of data subject rights that cannot be contractually disclaimed; Regulation (EU) 2016/679 Article 82 provides data subjects a right to compensation that cannot be waived by contract. UK GDPR contains equivalent provisions. The FTC's unfairness authority could be engaged if the liability cap results in consumers bearing losses that are disproportionately caused by Duolingo's conduct. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The $100 floor is standard, but for a platform with a large free user base, the practical recovery for most users is $100 or less, which may be insufficient to incentivize dispute resolution. GDPR and UK GDPR mandatory data breach liability rights are not subject to this cap for EU and UK users. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK users retain non-waivable rights to compensation under GDPR for data protection violations regardless of this contractual cap. Some U.S. states may impose minimum liability standards for data breaches under state privacy statutes. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: For institutional clients, a $100 cap (or 12-month fee equivalent) is likely insufficient for enterprise-scale deployments. Institutional agreements should negotiate separate liability provisions commensurate with the scope of deployment and data involved. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should assess whether the liability cap is consistent with GDPR Article 82 obligations for EU users, confirm that data breach notification and compensation obligations are maintained regardless of the contractual cap, and ensure that institutional agreements include appropriate indemnification and liability provisions tailored to the institutional context.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This cap means that even significant harm caused by a platform failure or data breach may result in minimal financial recovery for the average user, particularly free-tier users who have paid nothing.
Your financial recovery from Duolingo is capped at your last 12 months of payments or $100, which could be zero for free users, significantly limiting your practical legal remedies if the platform causes you harm.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Duolingo.