Mandatory Arbitration and Class Action Waiver

What it is

By using DraftKings, you agree to resolve any legal disputes through private arbitration rather than by filing a lawsuit in court, and you give up your right to join a class action lawsuit against DraftKings.

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This clause significantly limits your legal options if you have a dispute with DraftKings over money, account actions, or any other grievance, and removes your ability to join with other users in a class action.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

If DraftKings withholds your funds, closes your account, or you believe you were treated unfairly, this clause means you cannot sue in court or join a class action and must instead go through individual arbitration, which is typically more expensive and burdensome for individual consumers.

What you can do

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The arbitration provision invokes the Federal Arbitration Act as its governing framework, which courts have broadly upheld for consumer agreements. However, the provision may interact with state-level consumer protection statutes in California, New Jersey, and other jurisdictions that have examined the enforceability of pre-dispute arbitration clauses in consumer contracts. The FTC has signaled ongoing scrutiny of mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer agreements under its unfair or deceptive acts or practices authority. State AGs in several jurisdictions have challenged similar clauses in consumer-facing gaming and financial services contexts. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The clause is broad in scope, covering all disputes arising from the relationship and including claims predating the agreement, which extends beyond what some courts have upheld. The class action waiver compounds consumer impact by eliminating collective redress for systemic issues. The 30-day opt-out window is a standard feature but requires reliable tracking and recordkeeping to demonstrate compliance. JURISDICTION FLAGS: California courts have scrutinized class action waivers in consumer contracts under unconscionability doctrine, though the FAA preemption doctrine significantly limits state-level challenges. New Jersey, Washington, and other states have periodic legislative activity regarding consumer arbitration clauses. The breadth of the clause covering pre-agreement claims is a potential vulnerability in enforcement challenges. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: B2B agreements with DraftKings should assess whether this arbitration clause extends to commercial relationships or is limited to consumer accounts. The clause does carve out intellectual property and small claims court matters, which is a standard commercial accommodation. The indemnification provisions elsewhere in the document may interact with arbitration scope in ways that require separate analysis. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should audit the opt-out mechanism to confirm it is clearly disclosed at account creation, that the 30-day window is correctly calculated, and that opt-out records are maintained. Any update to the arbitration clause should trigger fresh notice obligations and re-evaluation of whether existing users need to be re-consented. The clause's retroactive scope covering pre-agreement claims warrants review for enforceability in key user jurisdictions.

Applicable agencies

Applicable regulations

Provision details

Other risks in this policy

• No-Refund Policy on Deposits high
• Account Termination Without Notice high
• User Indemnification of DraftKings medium
• Unilateral Terms Modification medium
• Geographic Eligibility Restrictions medium
• Segregated Player Funds Account low

Related Analysis

• Coinbase Requires Mandatory Arbitration. You Have 30 Days to Opt Out.

  Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.