Cursor · Cursor Privacy Policy · View original document ↗

AI Training Opt-In for Inputs and Suggestions

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Cursor recorded 2 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for Cursor Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.

This analysis describes what Cursor's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The provision creates a default restriction on model training data sourcing while establishing explicit carve-outs for security operations and user-directed data sharing. The inclusion of a preference management mechanism indicates the terms contemplate ongoing user control over whether inputs enter training workflows.

Interpretive note: The document does not define the threshold or process for a 'security review' flag, leaving the scope of that exception ambiguous.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, user inputs and suggestions are not automatically incorporated into model training absent one of three triggering events. Users retain ability to modify their preferences regarding training use through in-service controls, and explicit consent is required for inputs to be used for training purposes beyond security review scenarios.

How other platforms handle this

Supabase Medium

After registration, you may create, upload or transmit files, documents, videos, images, data or information as part of your use of the Service (collectively, "User Content"). This includes any inputs you provide to our AI-powered support tools and outputs generated in response to your inputs. User ...

Mistral AI Medium

Training Datasets. In some cases, we access datasets provided by third parties for our model training purposes. These datasets may include personal data (even if such third parties and Mistral AI use good practices to filter out such personal data), proprietary data, or public data. [...] Data publi...

DeepL Medium

To improve the quality of our services, we analyse texts submitted for translation. We ensure that this analysis cannot be traced back to individual users by anonymising the data before analysis. DeepL Pro subscribers' texts are not used to train our machine translation systems.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Cursor has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
We do not use Inputs or Suggestions to train our models, or permit third parties to use them for training, unless: (1) they are flagged for security review (in which case we may analyze them to improve our ability to detect and enforce our Terms of Service), (2) you explicitly report them to us (for example, as Feedback), or (3) you've explicitly agreed to their use for such training purposes. You can find instructions in the Service on how to manage your preferences regarding the use of Inputs and Suggestions for training.

— Excerpt from Cursor's Cursor Privacy Policy

Applicable regulations

EU AI Act
European Union
California AB 2013 AI Training Data Transparency
US-CA
Colorado AI Act
US-CO
EU AI Act - High Risk Provisions
EU
GDPR
European Union
Texas AI Act
Texas, USA
Trump Executive Order on AI Policy Framework
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
Cursor Privacy Policy
Entity
Cursor
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 7, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-008149
Document ID
CA-D-00452
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
1e5849a4a5fbaa739f760d04f8a003ee1ec366c9f4216cb1cb0ea9b8cf9d01f3
Analysis generated
May 7, 2026 17:01 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Cursor
Document: Cursor Privacy Policy
Record ID: CA-P-008149
Captured: 2026-05-07 17:01:07 UTC
SHA-256: 1e5849a4a5fbaa73…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/cursor/cursor-privacy-policy/ai-training-opt-in-for-inputs-and-suggestions/
Accessed: June 28, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Cursor's AI Training Opt-In for Inputs and Suggestions clause do?

The provision creates a default restriction on model training data sourcing while establishing explicit carve-outs for security operations and user-directed data sharing. The inclusion of a preference management mechanism indicates the terms contemplate ongoing user control over whether inputs enter training workflows.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, user inputs and suggestions are not automatically incorporated into model training absent one of three triggering events. Users retain ability to modify their preferences regarding training use through in-service controls, and explicit consent is required for inputs to be used for training purposes beyond security review scenarios.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Cursor?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cursor.