This analysis describes what Coursera's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The updated terms establish a new condition under which Coursera may deny refund requests: when a significant portion of course content has been accessed before the refund request is submitted. This means users who have already viewed or engaged with substantial course material may not be eligible for refunds, even if they request one shortly after enrollment. The policy does not define what constitutes a 'significant portion,' leaving the determination to Coursera's discretion.
View change record →The updated terms establish that canceling a Coursera subscription stops future billing but does not automatically issue a refund; refunds must be requested separately. Additionally, the revised policy now states that 'Refunds will not be provided for renewal charges on annual subscription plans,' eliminating refund eligibility for annual plan renewals. For specialization subscriptions, the refund window is clarified as 'within the applicable 7-day refund period or before earning a certificate, whichever occurs first.' These changes shift the refund process from automatic to manual and restrict refund availability for annual renewals. You can request a refund through Coursera's Support Services if you believe you are eligible under the stated refund windows.
View change record →The updated terms remove the guarantee of a 7-day free trial for all subscriptions and instead state that 'certain subscriptions may come with a free trial period' with details provided at checkout. This means trial availability and duration now vary by subscription type rather than being standardized. The obligation to cancel before the trial ends to avoid charges remains, but users can no longer rely on a fixed 7-day window; they must check the specific checkout page for each subscription to determine whether a trial is offered and how long it lasts.
View change record →How other platforms handle this
if a court decides that any of the provisions in the Prohibition of Class and Representative Actions...is invalid or unenforceable because it would prevent the exercise of a non-waivable right to pursue public injunctive relief...
If, after exhaustion of all appeals, any of these prohibitions...are found to be unenforceable with respect to a particular claim or request for relief...then such a claim or request for relief will be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction...
The parties agree to sever and litigate in court any request for public injunctive relief after completing arbitration for the underlying claim and all other claims.
"The arbitrator shall have exclusive authority to resolve any Claim, including, without limitation, disputes regarding the interpretation or application of the arbitration provision, including the enforceability, revocability, scope, or validity of the arbitration provision or any portion of the arbitration provision, except that all Claims regarding the class action waiver provision, including any claim that all or part of that provision is unenforceable, illegal, void or voidable...shall be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction and not by an arbitrator.Excerpt from Coursera's Terms of Use
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “The arbitrator shall have exclusive authority to resolve any Claim, including, without limitation, disputes regarding the interpretation or application of the arbitration provision, including the enforceability, revocability, scope, or validity of the arbitration provision or any portion of the arbitration provision, except that all Claims regarding the class action waiver …”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 197 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Coursera.