Cerebras states that it does not keep the prompts you send or the responses you receive when using its AI training, inference, or chatbot services. This is a user-favorable operational commitment that distinguishes these services from general data collection.
This analysis describes what Cerebras's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users submitting potentially sensitive business, technical, or personal information to Cerebras AI services may rely on this commitment as a data minimization assurance, though the policy does not describe the technical controls or audit mechanisms that implement it.
Interpretive note: The commitment is stated but the policy provides no technical description of how non-retention is implemented or verified, creating uncertainty about operational enforcement.
If accurate and technically enforced, this provision means that the content of your AI interactions is not stored by Cerebras after processing, reducing the risk that your prompts or outputs could be accessed in a data breach, shared with third parties, or used for model training without your knowledge.
How other platforms handle this
At Ledger, earning and maintaining our users' trust is a top priority. That's why we are deeply committed not only to protecting your privacy and securing your personal data, but also to being fully transparent about how we handle it.
If you are located in the European Economic Area, Switzerland, or the United Kingdom, you have the right to access, correct, or erase your personal data; the right to restrict or object to our processing of your personal data; the right to data portability; and, where our processing is based on your...
We may display advertisements on our Services and those advertisements may be targeted to your interests based on your personal information. We may share your personal information with advertising partners for interest-based advertising purposes. You may opt out of interest-based advertising by visi...
Monitoring
Cerebras has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Your use of the Services, including our training, inference and chatbot Services, provided that we do not retain inputs and outputs associated with our training, inference, and chatbot Services as described in Section 6— Excerpt from Cerebras's Cerebras Privacy Policy
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages GDPR data minimization and storage limitation principles for EU users, as well as CCPA obligations regarding the categories of personal information collected. The FTC may evaluate whether this stated commitment constitutes a material representation about data practices that must be technically implemented. Where this commitment is not operationally enforced, it could be characterized as a deceptive practice under Section 5 of the FTC Act. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The provision makes an affirmative operational commitment that creates a compliance obligation: if subprocessors or internal systems do retain inputs and outputs contrary to this statement, the company faces regulatory and reputational exposure. The policy does not describe verification, audit, or contractual mechanisms that enforce this commitment downstream. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK users would evaluate this commitment against GDPR storage limitation requirements. California users may consider whether this affects the categories of personal information collected as disclosed under CCPA. The commitment applies globally as stated but is not qualified by jurisdiction. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams and enterprise customers should assess whether vendor and subprocessor agreements with Cerebras contractually reflect this non-retention commitment, and whether data processing agreements include audit rights to verify compliance. The absence of a described enforcement mechanism may create a gap in B2B contract due diligence. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should confirm through data mapping and subprocessor review that no logging, caching, or model fine-tuning processes retain user inputs or outputs in a manner inconsistent with this commitment. If the policy is updated to modify this commitment, affected users and enterprise customers should be notified pursuant to applicable legal obligations.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Ad personalization controls removed. Contact scanning added. Advertiser data partnerships quietly dropped. A timeline of every change.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
Users submitting potentially sensitive business, technical, or personal information to Cerebras AI services may rely on this commitment as a data minimization assurance, though the policy does not describe the technical controls or audit mechanisms that implement it.
If accurate and technically enforced, this provision means that the content of your AI interactions is not stored by Cerebras after processing, reducing the risk that your prompts or outputs could be accessed in a data breach, shared with third parties, or used for model training without your knowledge.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Cerebras.