Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
Apple reserves the right to remove apps and expel developers from the Apple Developer Program for conduct including review process manipulation, user data theft, copying another developer's work, ratings manipulation, and chart ranking inflation through paid or fake feedback.
This analysis describes what Apple's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes that account termination and app removal are available enforcement outcomes for a range of conduct violations, including third-party services engaged on the developer's behalf for review or ranking manipulation, without specifying an appeal process in this section.
The updated guidelines state that developers must ensure kids receive age-appropriate experiences within their apps and must remove user-generated content that violates the guidelines, terms of service, or community standards. Under the revised policy, if Apple identifies policy-violating content, the developer will be asked to remove it and provide a compliance improvement plan. Based on the developer's response, the app may be removed from the App Store until compliance is demonstrated. This establishes a formal escalation pathway where developer inaction or inadequate remediation can result in app suspension or removal.
View change record →This provision establishes that apps removed for fraud, data theft, or manipulation are taken down from the App Store, which affects consumer access to those apps and any associated in-app purchases or subscriptions.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Developer Expulsion for Review Manipulation and Fraud and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Apple has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"If you attempt to cheat the system (for example, by trying to trick the review process, steal user data, copy another developer's work, manipulate ratings or App Store discovery) your apps will be removed from the store and you will be expelled from the Apple Developer Program. If we find that you have attempted to manipulate reviews, inflate your chart rankings with paid, incentivized, filtered, or fake feedback, or engage with third-party services to do so on your behalf, we will take steps to preserve the integrity of the App Store, which may include expelling you from the Apple Developer Program.Excerpt from Apple's App Store Review Guidelines
1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Review and rating manipulation engages FTC guidelines on endorsements and testimonials, which require that paid or incentivized reviews be disclosed. The FTC has taken enforcement action against companies that use fake reviews or paid endorsements without disclosure. Data theft provisions interact with the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and state computer crime statutes. Intellectual property copying engages copyright law under the Copyright Act. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The expulsion provision grants Apple broad discretionary authority to terminate developer accounts based on its determination of misconduct, including conduct by third-party services engaged by the developer. The absence of a defined procedural review process in this section of the guidelines creates operational uncertainty for developers regarding appeal mechanisms. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: FTC jurisdiction over fake review practices applies to US-based developers and US-facing apps. EU consumer protection law similarly prohibits fake reviews under the Omnibus Directive. Developers operating in multiple markets should assess whether their review solicitation practices comply with applicable disclosure requirements in each jurisdiction. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Developers using third-party marketing or app store optimization services should review those vendor agreements to confirm services do not include paid reviews, fake ratings, or incentivized feedback practices, as the guidelines hold developers responsible for third-party conduct on their behalf. Vendor contracts should include representations about compliance with App Store Review Guidelines and applicable consumer protection law. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should review any marketing vendor relationships that include review solicitation, rating improvement, or App Store discovery optimization services. Internal policies governing user review solicitation should be assessed against FTC disclosure requirements and App Store guidelines. Developers should ensure that any in-app review prompts comply with Apple's designated APIs and do not offer incentives for positive ratings.
This provision establishes that account termination and app removal are available enforcement outcomes for a range of conduct violations, including third-party services engaged on the developer's behalf for review or ranking manipulation, without specifying an appeal process in this section.
This provision establishes that apps removed for fraud, data theft, or manipulation are taken down from the App Store, which affects consumer access to those apps and any associated in-app purchases or subscriptions.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Apple.