This analysis describes what Anthropic's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The requirement creates a formal, documented obligation for Anthropic to affirmatively demonstrate misalignment risk awareness and mitigation at a specific capability level, rather than leaving it to discretionary assessment.
Anthropic is required to produce a documented affirmative case on misalignment risks and mitigation once its models reach the AI R&D-4 capability threshold.
How other platforms handle this
...and (b) provide any reasonable information that is relevant to systemic risks assessment and mitigation to Mistral AI to allow Mistral AI to comply with its own obligations under the Applicable AI Laws.
Our Chatbots may generate outputs that are inaccurate or inappropriate for your situation, so you should not rely solely on their answers. You should always verify the accuracy of such information
StockX may use fraud protection measures, including algorithms and automated systems, to monitor for fraud. Such measures may result in cancellation of orders or listings or account suspension.
"once models cross the AI R&D-4 capability threshold, we develop an affirmative case identifying the most immediate and relevant misalignment risks from models pursuing misaligned goals and explaining how we have mitigated themExcerpt from Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The requirement creates a formal, documented obligation for Anthropic to affirmatively demonstrate misalignment risk awareness and mitigation at a specific capability level, rather than leaving it to discretionary assessment.
Anthropic is required to produce a documented affirmative case on misalignment risks and mitigation once its models reach the AI R&D-4 capability threshold.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 211 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic.