This analysis describes what Anthropic's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes the core operational trigger mechanism of the RSP: internally defined capability benchmarks that create mandatory internal obligations for Anthropic to upgrade safeguards and publish risk assessments before continuing deployment of models crossing those thresholds.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle ASL Capability Thresholds and Mandatory Safeguard Upgrades and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →"Our RSP requires that once models cross the AI R&D-4 capability threshold, we develop an affirmative case identifying the most immediate and relevant misalignment risks from models pursuing misaligned goals and explaining how we have mitigated them.Excerpt from Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
This provision establishes the core operational trigger mechanism of the RSP: internally defined capability benchmarks that create mandatory internal obligations for Anthropic to upgrade safeguards and publish risk assessments before continuing deployment of models crossing those thresholds.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic.