This analysis describes what Anthropic's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision discloses that Anthropic's adherence to its own stated RSP requirements has not been complete, with specific procedural gaps identified in evaluation timelines, methodology, and buffer assessment; the company characterizes these gaps as minimal risk and uses them as a basis for policy revisions.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Self-Reported RSP Compliance Gaps and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →"As part of this, we reviewed how well we adhered to the framework and identified a small number of instances where we fell short of meeting the full letter of its requirements. These areas were: Our most recent evaluations were completed 3 days later than the 3-month interval... Some of our evaluations lacked some basic elicitation techniques such as best-of-N or chain-of-thought prompting... Our evaluations in one domain were not explicitly designed to establish the 6x scaling buffer mentioned in the previous policy.Excerpt from Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
This provision discloses that Anthropic's adherence to its own stated RSP requirements has not been complete, with specific procedural gaps identified in evaluation timelines, methodology, and buffer assessment; the company characterizes these gaps as minimal risk and uses them as a basis for policy revisions.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic.