Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
This page describes what the document states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
Anthropic's Acceptable Use Policy sets out what users across all product surfaces (Claude.ai, API, cloud integrations) may and may not do with Claude. The policy's most operationally significant provisions establish mandatory qualified human review and AI disclosure requirements before AI-generated recommendations are delivered in high-stakes domains including medical diagnosis, legal advice, credit decisions, employment screening, insurance underwriting, and housing approvals. Additionally, the policy prohibits using model outputs to train other AI models without Anthropic's prior authorization, directly affecting developers who may seek to use API outputs for fine-tuning or distillation purposes.
This document is Anthropic's Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), effective November 12, 2026, governing all users who submit inputs to Anthropic's products and services, including Claude.ai, Claude Code, API consumers, cloud provider customers, and end users of third-party integrations. The agreement establishes three tiered categories of restrictions: Universal Usage Standards (absolute prohibitions applicable to all users), High-risk Use Case Requirements (mandating qualified human-in-the-loop review, AI disclosure, and independent safety controls for AI recommendations in legal, medical, financial, credit, insurance, housing, employment, education, healthcare access, public benefits, legal status, and physical action domains), and Additional Use Case Guidelines covering consumer-facing chatbots, products serving minors, agentic deployments, and directory-listed software. Notably, the policy reserves enforcement authority to Anthropic's Safeguards Team, which may warn, throttle, limit, suspend, or terminate access upon suspected violations, and it explicitly prohibits use of model outputs to train competing AI models without prior authorization, a provision with direct implications for developers and enterprise API consumers. The policy engages frameworks including GDPR, CCPA, COPPA, the EU AI Act, FTC Act, HIPAA, and sector-specific regulations governing employment, credit, housing, and financial services, with several High-risk AI Recommendation categories corresponding directly to regulated activities under these frameworks. Compliance obligations vary significantly by jurisdiction, and the policy itself acknowledges that local laws take precedence where they conflict with or add requirements beyond those stated in the AUP.
The agreement establishes that individuals receiving advice or subject to decisions based on High-risk AI Recommendations must be clearly informed that AI was involved in producing the recommendation. Under these terms, operators deploying Claude in high-risk domains are required to maintain qualified human oversight before AI-generated recommendations reach affected individuals, which creates a procedural layer between model output and consequential decisions in areas such as healthcare, credit, employment, and housing. You can report potentially inaccurate, biased, or harmful model outputs by contacting usersafety@anthropic.com or using the in-product feedback mechanism where available.
Which mapped governance frameworks each document engages, tied to the specific provisions that engage them.
1 important change detected
5 versions captured · Latest change detected by ConductAtlas: October 2026
We withheld clauses we had published from this document. Each withholding is recorded in our correction log:
Anthropic has updated this document before. Monitor includes alerts from a daily check, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping? Insight includes governance timelines, drift analysis, and full provision tracking.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Prohibition on ban circumvention via alternate accounts and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Anthropic is more transparent than most AI companies about data retention. Here's exactly what happens when you delete your data, and how t…
Governance Monitoring
Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 343 platforms.