Certain high-stakes uses of Claude, such as mental health support, medical advice, or crisis services, require operators to meet additional safety standards beyond the baseline rules.
This analysis describes what Anthropic's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The existence of a separate, elevated tier for high-risk consumer-facing use cases signals that Anthropic recognizes some deployments create heightened risk of harm to vulnerable individuals, and operators in those spaces face stricter compliance obligations.
Interpretive note: The provided document text was truncated and did not include the full text of the High-Risk Use Case Requirements, so the specific additional obligations in this tier cannot be assessed.
The Pentagon's supply chain risk designation does not directly modify Anthropic's consumer-facing terms of service, but creates government-level procurement restrictions that may affect Anthropic's ability to contract with federal agencies and defense contractors. The designation reflects the Department of Defense's assessment that Anthropic's acceptable use policy restrictions on mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons present supply chain governance concerns under federal law. Commercial users of Anthropic's services are not directly subject to this designation, but federal agencies, defense contractors, and government-dependent organizations may face new contracting or compliance obligations when evaluating Anthropic as a vendor.
View change record →If you use a Claude-powered product for mental health support, medical information, or similar sensitive purposes, that product should be operating under stricter safety requirements than a general-purpose deployment. You can expect additional safeguards in those contexts, though the specific requirements depend on the operator's compliance.
How other platforms handle this
In assessing misuse, we consider factors such as evidence that a report was motivated by bias or hatred (e.g., based on protected characteristics such as race, sexual orientation, or gender identity) or other malicious intent.
We review account behavior and content that Members create, send, and publish in Mailchimp, including Campaigns and Websites.
We allow Content that names individuals in the highest positions in a company who have broad influence over the work environment, as long as the Content describes the individual's behavior or performance at work.
"Our High-Risk Use Case Requirements apply to specific consumer-facing use cases that pose an elevated risk of harm.Excerpt from Anthropic's API Usage Policy
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: High-risk consumer-facing deployments likely engage HIPAA where health information is involved, FTC Act Section 5 for deceptive health claims, FDA regulations where AI-generated content constitutes medical device output, and state-level telehealth and …
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The existence of a separate, elevated tier for high-risk consumer-facing use cases signals that Anthropic recognizes some deployments create heightened risk of harm to vulnerable individuals, and operators in those spaces face stricter compliance obligations.
If you use a Claude-powered product for mental health support, medical information, or similar sensitive purposes, that product should be operating under stricter safety requirements than a general-purpose deployment. You can expect additional safeguards in those contexts, though the specific requirements depend on the operator's compliance.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 142 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic.