Airbnb · Airbnb Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Governing Law and Jurisdiction

Low severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 200 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Airbnb recorded 6 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for Airbnb Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

US disputes with Airbnb that go to court must be filed in California courts, and California law governs the interpretation of these terms, regardless of where you live in the United States.

This analysis describes what Airbnb's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

If you are a US user outside California who needs to litigate a dispute against Airbnb that falls outside arbitration, you are contractually required to do so in San Francisco, which creates a practical barrier for most users.

Interpretive note: Enforceability of the forum selection and governing law clauses varies materially by jurisdiction; EU/EEA and UK consumer protection law generally renders such clauses unenforceable against consumers in those regions.

Change history

modified May 27, 2026

Changed section reference from 'Section 19' to 'Section 23', changed 'will be conducted' to 'must be brought', and changed 'consent to venue and personal jurisdiction there' to 'consent to venue and personal jurisdiction in San Francisco County, California'.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

The California venue requirement means most US users who pursue court litigation against Airbnb must do so in California, adding travel costs and logistical difficulty. This provision does not apply to EU/UK users, who contract with Airbnb Ireland UC under different governing law terms.

How other platforms handle this

Cloudflare Medium

These Terms shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of law rules, and the federal laws of the United States. Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California...

MetaMask Medium

These Terms of Service and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with them or their subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice o...

Target Medium

These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provisions. Any disputes not subject to arbitration will be resolved in the state or federal courts located in Hennepin County, Minnesota.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Airbnb has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
These Terms will be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California and the United States of America, without regard to conflict-of-law provisions. Judicial proceedings (other than small claims actions) that are excluded from the arbitration agreement in Section 23 must be brought in state or federal court in San Francisco County, California, USA, and you and Airbnb both consent to venue and personal jurisdiction in San Francisco County, California.

— Excerpt from Airbnb's Airbnb Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Forum selection clauses in consumer contracts are subject to review under the FTC Act and state consumer protection statutes. Several states have enacted laws limiting the enforceability of out-of-state forum selection clauses in consumer contracts. For EU/UK users, governing law and jurisdiction are determined by the contracting entity and applicable consumer protection rules, which generally cannot be displaced by a choice of foreign law to the detriment of consumers. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low to Medium. The California governing law and forum selection clause is standard for US-headquartered technology platforms. Its primary practical effect is to require non-California US users to litigate in San Francisco, which is a meaningful barrier for individual consumers. Business users and professional hosts with resources to litigate remotely are less materially affected. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: Non-California US users face the greatest practical barrier from this clause. EU/EEA and UK users contract with Airbnb Ireland UC and are subject to Irish law and EU/UK consumer protection frameworks, which provide mandatory jurisdictional protections that override choice of foreign law clauses in consumer contracts. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: US-based property management companies and business hosts should ensure their own legal and operational infrastructure accounts for California venue requirements in any dispute with Airbnb. Cross-border operators should clarify which Airbnb entity they contract with and under which governing law. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should confirm whether applicable state law in users' home jurisdictions limits enforceability of the California forum selection clause, particularly in states that have enacted consumer protection venue statutes.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • State AG
    State attorneys general may review forum selection clauses in consumer contracts for compliance with state consumer protection laws limiting out-of-state venue requirements
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Airbnb Terms of Service
Entity
Airbnb
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 10, 2026
Last verified
May 10, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-002763
Document ID
CA-D-00075
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
37ba96a6f259d822ff1e23e1a14c98b352e38a80fcb07b11940b09b4df5b361c
Analysis generated
May 10, 2026 03:49 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Airbnb
Document: Airbnb Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-002763
Captured: 2026-05-10 03:49:29 UTC
SHA-256: 37ba96a6f259d822…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/airbnb/airbnb-terms-of-service/governing-law-and-jurisdiction/
Accessed: June 18, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Low
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Airbnb's Governing Law and Jurisdiction clause do?

If you are a US user outside California who needs to litigate a dispute against Airbnb that falls outside arbitration, you are contractually required to do so in San Francisco, which creates a practical barrier for most users.

How does this clause affect you?

The California venue requirement means most US users who pursue court litigation against Airbnb must do so in California, adding travel costs and logistical difficulty. This provision does not apply to EU/UK users, who contract with Airbnb Ireland UC under different governing law terms.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 200 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Airbnb?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Airbnb.