Adyen · Adyen Terms · View original document ↗

Indemnification Obligation

Medium severity Medium confidence Inferredfromcontext Uncommon · 13 of 325 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Adyen Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

If Adyen faces a legal claim or fine because of how you use its services or because you broke a rule, you have to pay Adyen's legal costs and any resulting damages.

This analysis describes what Adyen's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision means merchants bear the financial risk of third-party claims and regulatory fines that arise from their own conduct, including card scheme rule violations that may result in significant per-transaction fines.

Interpretive note: The verbatim indemnification clause language could not be fully extracted due to document truncation; the characterization reflects standard indemnification structures in payment processing agreements.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

This provision creates a financial obligation for merchants to cover Adyen's costs if their business activities generate legal claims, regulatory penalties, or card scheme fines, which can represent significant unexpected liabilities particularly for merchants in high-risk or regulated industries.

How other platforms handle this

T-Mobile Medium

You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold us and our directors, officers, and employees harmless from any claims arising out of use of the Services, Products, or Devices, breach of the Agreement, or violation of any laws or regulations, or the rights of any third party by you, any person on your acco...

Google Medium

If you're a business user, you will defend and indemnify Google and its affiliates, officers, agents, and employees from all liabilities, damages, losses, and costs (including reasonable legal fees) arising out of or relating to: any allegation or claim that your content or your use of the services ...

eBay Medium

You will indemnify and hold us (including our affiliates and subsidiaries, as well as our and their respective officers, directors, employees, and agents) harmless from any claim or demand, including reasonable legal fees, made by any third party due to or arising out of your breach of this User Agr...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Adyen has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Adyen and its affiliates, officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against any claims, damages, losses, costs, and expenses (including reasonable legal fees) arising out of or relating to your use of the services, your breach of these Terms and Conditions, or your violation of any applicable law or card scheme rules.

— Excerpt from Adyen's Adyen Terms

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Indemnification clauses in payment processing agreements are standard commercial practice and are generally enforceable in commercial B2B contracts. However, in jurisdictions with unfair contract terms legislation, broad indemnification obligations imposed on smaller businesses may face enforceability challenges if they are considered disproportionate. Card scheme fine pass-through indemnification engages with scheme-level enforcement mechanisms operated by Visa and Mastercard. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The indemnification scope covering card scheme rule violations is particularly broad because card scheme rules are complex, frequently updated, and not always directly accessible to merchants. Where Adyen receives a scheme-level fine as acquiring bank, the contractual right to seek indemnification from the merchant shifts the financial burden of acquiring bank compliance risk to the merchant. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU unfair terms legislation may limit the enforceability of broadly drafted indemnification clauses in contracts with smaller businesses that lack equal bargaining power. UK Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 applies reasonableness tests to indemnification clauses in commercial contracts. US enforceability varies by state. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise merchants should negotiate caps on indemnification obligations, carve-outs for losses caused by Adyen's own negligence, and a right to receive advance notice and opportunity to defend before Adyen settles any claim that triggers indemnification. The inclusion of affiliates, officers, and agents within the indemnified group is broader than minimal commercial standards. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Risk management teams should assess the financial exposure created by the indemnification obligation in their specific merchant category, particularly regarding chargeback monitoring program thresholds and the potential for scheme-level fines. Insurance coverage for card scheme fine exposure should be considered.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Watcher free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable regulations

FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Adyen Terms
Entity
Adyen
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 7, 2026
Last verified
May 10, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-008729
Document ID
CA-D-00664
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
83f05235f9f84e017ec38201e79ccb6e55458fd7f58fb9cfc7349c41a983785e
Analysis generated
May 7, 2026 22:47 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Adyen
Document: Adyen Terms
Record ID: CA-P-008729
Captured: 2026-05-07 22:47:24 UTC
SHA-256: 83f05235f9f84e01…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/adyen/adyen-terms/indemnification-obligation/
Accessed: May 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Professional free trial

Or start with Watcher →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Adyen's Indemnification Obligation clause do?

This provision means merchants bear the financial risk of third-party claims and regulatory fines that arise from their own conduct, including card scheme rule violations that may result in significant per-transaction fines.

How does this clause affect you?

This provision creates a financial obligation for merchants to cover Adyen's costs if their business activities generate legal claims, regulatory penalties, or card scheme fines, which can represent significant unexpected liabilities particularly for merchants in high-risk or regulated industries.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 13 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Adyen?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Adyen.