If you have a dispute with Activision, you must resolve it through one-on-one arbitration rather than going to court, and you cannot join with other users in a class action lawsuit.
This analysis describes what Activision's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause limits your ability to sue Activision in court or join a group lawsuit, which can significantly reduce practical legal recourse for individual consumers with smaller claims.
Interpretive note: The full operative language of Section 4 is not reproduced in the truncated document text provided; enforceability and opt-out mechanics depend on that complete text and vary by jurisdiction.
Users who experience harm from Activision products or services lose the ability to pursue claims in court or as part of a class action, meaning they must individually arbitrate disputes, which can be procedurally complex and costly relative to the value of a typical gaming-related claim.
How other platforms handle this
If, however, this Class Action Waiver is deemed invalid or unenforceable with respect to a particular Dispute...neither you nor Chegg will be entitled to arbitration of such Dispute.
This Arbitration Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall include any claims brought by or against any third parties, including but not limited to your spouses, heirs, third-party beneficiaries and permitted assigns...
the arbitration provider, National Arbitration and Mediation ("NAM"), shall not accept or administer any demand for arbitration and shall administratively close any arbitration unless the Party bringing such demand for arbitration can certify in writing that the terms...were fully satisfied.
"IMPORTANT NOTICE: THIS AGREEMENT IS SUBJECT TO BINDING ARBITRATION AND A WAIVER OF CLASS ACTION RIGHTS AS DETAILED IN SECTION 4Excerpt from Activision's Terms of Use
1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision implicates the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), which generally supports arbitration clause enforceability in the US, and the FTC Act, under which the FTC has scrutinized mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer …
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This clause limits your ability to sue Activision in court or join a group lawsuit, which can significantly reduce practical legal recourse for individual consumers with smaller claims.
Users who experience harm from Activision products or services lose the ability to pursue claims in court or as part of a class action, meaning they must individually arbitrate disputes, which can be procedurally complex and costly relative to the value of a typical gaming-related claim.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 205 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Activision.