Compare privacy rights governance provisions between OpenAI and Google-Gemini. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
This provision establishes OpenAI's default authorization to use submitted Content for service improvement and product development, while creating carve-outs for enterprise and API customers. The opt-out mechanism allows individual users to restrict use of their Content for model training purposes, affecting how user-generated data flows into OpenAI's product development processes.
Consumer impact
Users operate under a default authorization permitting OpenAI to use their Content for service maintenance and new product development. Users who wish to restrict use of their Content specifically for model training may opt out through designated mechanisms, but the terms authorize continued use for other specified purposes unless the user exercises the opt-out option.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
We may use Content to provide, maintain, and improve our Services and to develop new products and services. We won't use Content from ChatGPT Team, ChatGPT Enterprise, or our API (outside of our models) to train our models. If you don't want us to use your Content to train our models, you can opt out by following the instructions in our Help Center or by visiting our privacy portal.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No Privacy Rights clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisProfessional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.