ConductAtlas › Compare › Consent
Cross-platform comparison

Consent, Cross-Platform Comparison

5 platforms tracked · 5 provisions · 1 platforms high severity · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

5
Platforms
1
High severity
3
Medium
1
Low
352
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing GitHub vs Cursor · Consent provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare consent governance provisions between GitHub and Cursor. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

GitHub
No Consent clause found in our archive for this platform.
ai Cursor Model Training Opt-Out
Medium
What it means
This clause defines the default data handling practice for model training purposes and establishes an opt-in framework rather than opt-out. It operationally restricts how the service provider may repurpose user content for machine learning development absent affirmative user authorization.
Consumer impact
Users operate under a default where their Inputs and Suggestions are excluded from training uses unless they affirmatively elect otherwise through preference settings. Users retain control over whether their content contributions may be used for AI model training through Service controls.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
ANYSPHERE WILL NOT USE CONTENT TO TRAIN, OR ALLOW ANY THIRD PARTY TO TRAIN, ANY AI MODELS, UNLESS YOU'VE EXPLICITLY AGREED TO THE USE OF CONTENT FOR TRAINING. You can find instructions in the Service for how to manage your preferences regarding the use of Inputs and Suggestions for training.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
CA-P-004341
Recent changes

Cursor removed the word 'indexing' from its description of backend functionality in an update detec…

Aug 29, 2026 Medium

Cursor removed two sentences from its Data Use & Privacy Overview that previously described how cod…

Cursor expanded its security certifications section in an update detected on August 27, 2026. Previ…

AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any tracked platform updates this provision.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the research letter, free
Browse by provision type
Account Control Content Moderation Acceptable Use Restrictions Payment & Fees Refunds & Chargebacks Data Collection Data Usage Data Sharing Data Retention Privacy Rights Arbitration Legal Jurisdiction Liability Limitation Indemnification Platform Discretion Policy Changes Enforcement Actions Monetization Rules Developer / API Restrictions AI / Automated Decision-Making Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries Disclosure and Transparency Requirements Targeting and Audience Restrictions Commission, Payout, and Attribution Terms Landing Page and Destination Requirements Intellectual Property General Contract Terms Export Controls & Sanctions Other