Compare how GitHub and Cursor handle training, data retention, liability, arbitration, and governance changes over time.
Governance changes can affect enterprise usage rights, data retention policies, training controls, and dispute handling. This comparison is based on continuously monitored governance documents.
Arbitration: GitHub (Not detected) vs Cursor (Mandatory).
Class Action: GitHub (Not waived) vs Cursor (Waived).
GitHub has broader governance coverage across 22 provision categories vs 15.
Both vendors disclose AI training provisions. Review specific opt-out mechanisms and data retention terms before uploading sensitive data.
High-severity provisions include mandatory arbitration, broad data sharing, AI training clauses, and liability limitations. Governance stability reflects document change frequency over the last 30 days. Methodology →
Governance provisions grouped by type. Higher counts indicate more detailed governance language in that area.
No governance changes detected in the last 30 days.
No governance changes detected in the last 30 days.
The policy states GitHub relies on Standard Contractual Clauses for internation…
The policy authorizes use of user data for AI product development, which may in…
The policy authorizes transfer of personal data to Microsoft's broader corporat…
The clause operationalizes CCPA/CPRA statutory rights by specifying the mechani…
The clause establishes the operational scope of GitHub's data use for model dev…
This provision establishes the full scope of data use when Privacy Mode is disa…
This provision allocates all risk from automatically executed AI-generated code…
This provision places contractual responsibility on users to ensure they do not…
This provision removes the right to litigate disputes in court and to participa…
Employees or users whose accounts are provisioned by an organization may not ha…